The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’s Restricted Recognition of Foreign Carbon Pricing: Policy Options for China
EU炭素国境調整メカニズムによる外国炭素価格の制限的承認：中国向け政策オプション (AI 翻訳)
Jingyi Wang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
EUのCBAMが2026年に完全施行されると中国輸出に影響を与える。中国の炭素価格はEU ETSより低いため、本論文は資源税と消費税を暗黙の炭素価格としてCBAMのクレジット対象に拡大することを提案する。ただし、依然としてEUと中国の効果的な炭素価格差は大きく、経済の脱炭素化が不可欠と結論づける。
English
When the EU CBAM becomes fully effective in 2026, Chinese exports will be affected due to lower domestic carbon prices. This paper proposes expanding CBAM crediting to include implicit carbon prices such as China's resource tax and consumption tax, which could reduce costs for Chinese exporters. However, the gap between effective carbon prices remains significant, emphasizing the need for China's own decarbonization.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業にとってもCBAMは輸出競争力に関わる重要テーマ。本論文は、直接的な炭素価格以外にも間接的な課税を炭素価格とみなす議論を提供し、日本のカーボンプライシング政策（化石燃料課税等）の国際的認知可能性を示唆する。SSBJ対応やサプライチェーン開示にも示唆がある。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global debate on CBAM by advocating broader recognition of diverse carbon pricing instruments (including implicit taxes). It offers a policy framework relevant for countries like China, India, or Japan that use carbon taxes or resource taxes, and highlights the limitations of border adjustments as a substitute for domestic decarbonization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:A novel approach to operationalizing effective carbon prices for CBAM compliance, with implications for trade and climate policy interaction.
🏢実務担当者:Insights on how non-EU carbon pricing instruments (e.g., resource taxes) could potentially reduce CBAM liabilities for exporters.
🏛政策担当者:Policy options for expanding CBAM crediting rules to include implicit carbon prices, relevant for trade negotiations and carbon pricing design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
When the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) adopted by the European Commission becomes fully effective in 2026, it will inevitably affect exports from China and other jurisdictions. The EU CBAM requires that imports into the EU carry a carbon price similar to that of items manufactured within the EU. Although China has a national carbon emissions trading system (ETS), its current carbon price is a mere fraction of that of the EU ETS. This article supports the expansion of CBAM crediting of carbon pricing in third countries by using an effective carbon pricing method that covers both explicit and implicit carbon prices. Two taxes collected in China, resource tax and consumption tax, can be considered as effective carbon prices, which could help reduce the CBAM cost on Chinese exporters. Nevertheless, this article points out that the gap between the EU’s and China’s effective carbon prices will still be significant even after taking indirect carbon prices into account. Advocating the expansion of the CBAM crediting rules can only be a stopgap approach compared with decarbonizing China’s economy.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2026024first seen 2026-06-27 04:59:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。