Climate justice, land-use change emissions and global health
気候正義、土地利用変化による排出とグローバルヘルス (AI 翻訳)
Milene Consenso Tonetto
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ブラジルのアマゾン熱帯雨林の森林破壊による土地利用変化排出（LULUCF）は温室効果ガスの主要因であり、地球温暖化と感染症リスクを高めている。本論文は、歴史的排出（汚染者負担）、行動能力、および生物多様性保護の倫理的義務を考慮したハイブリッド責任モデルを提案し、CBDR-RC原則に基づく公正な気候行動を提唱する。One Healthアプローチに沿って、ブラジルを事例にグローバルな気候責任の公平な配分を検討する。
English
This paper addresses land-use change emissions from Amazon deforestation in Brazil as a leading source of GHGs and a driver of epidemic risks. It proposes a hybrid responsibility model incorporating historical emissions, capacity to act, and biodiversity protection, grounded in the CBDR-RC principle. Using a One Health perspective, it argues for ethically robust climate policies that balance mitigation and adaptation in countries like Brazil.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は森林由来の排出削減には直接関与しないが、気候正義と生物多様性保護の議論は、日本の国際的な気候政策や途上国支援に示唆を与える。特に、CBDR-RC原則の適用やOne Healthアプローチは、日本のGX戦略におけるグローバルな視点として参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on climate justice by proposing a hybrid responsibility model that balances historical emissions, capacity, and biodiversity stewardship. It challenges traditional burden-sharing frameworks and aligns with the One Health approach, offering a novel perspective for international climate negotiations and policy design, especially for countries with significant land-use emissions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:GX researchers interested in climate justice and land-use policy should note the hybrid responsibility model integrating historical emissions, capacity, and biodiversity ethics as a framework for equitable climate action.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers in countries with land-use emissions, especially Brazil, can use the model to design ethically robust mitigation and adaptation policies; broader policy community may consider CBDR-RC application in international agreements.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change is one of the most pressing global challenges, demanding strong ethical commitments to address its interconnected environmental and health risks. In Brazil, the leading source of greenhouse gas emissions is the land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF) sector, particularly deforestation in the Amazon rainforest. This not only accelerates global warming but also increases the risk of epidemics and infectious disease spillovers, as highlighted by the IPCC in 2023. As the global carbon budget rapidly shrinks, the need for urgent and equitable climate action becomes increasingly evident, especially in countries like Brazil. This paper proposes a hybrid responsibility model that incorporates three key considerations: historical emissions (polluter pays), national capacity to act (ability to pay), and the ethical imperative to protect biodiversity, particularly due to its role in preventing future pandemic risks. While grounded in the principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC), this model offers a more just and practical framework to guide both mitigation and adaptation efforts. Brazil’s dual role as a major emitter due to deforestation and as a crucial steward of global biodiversity requires climate policies that are ethically robust and ecologically informed. In alignment with the One Health approach, which emphasizes the interdependence of human, animal, and ecosystem health, this paper examines Brazil’s ongoing deforestation crisis in the Amazon as a case study in the fair distribution of global climate responsibilities.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2026.271.17first seen 2026-05-14 23:14:31
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。