gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Agroforestry Policies in France

フランスのアグロフォレストリー政策 (AI 翻訳)

Fabien Liagre, Valentin Laubriet, Numa Faucherre, Daniele Ori, Daria Renault, Gerald Lawson

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-05#政策Origin: EU
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20040669
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20040669

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本報告書は、フランスにおけるアグロフォレストリー政策と慣行を詳細に説明している。樹木と作物・家畜の統合を支援する国家枠組みと共通農業政策(CAP)の役割、炭素クレジット(Label Bas-Carbone)や森林・土地利用規制との関連を分析。農家が直面する制度上の障壁や推奨事項も提示。

English

This policy briefing details agroforestry policies and practices in France, focusing on CAP support, carbon sequestration through Label Bas-Carbone, and interactions with LULUCF and EUDR. It identifies barriers such as tenant farming laws and budget volatility, and offers 20 recommendations for policymakers.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では森林炭素クレジット(J-クレジット)や農地の炭素貯留が注目される中、フランスのLabel Bas-CarboneやCAPエコスキームの運用実態は示唆に富む。ただし、日本の農地制度とは異なるため直接適用は難しい。

In the global GX context

This briefing provides a European case study on integrating agroforestry into climate and agricultural policy, with insights for carbon farming and LULUCF accounting. It highlights structural barriers and policy tools that may inform global discussions on land-based carbon removals and biodiversity co-benefits.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Useful for scholars studying land-use policy, carbon sequestration, and CAP effectiveness.

🏛政策担当者:Relevant for officials designing agricultural carbon programs or reforming land tenure rules.

📄 Abstract(原文)

EURAF Policy Briefing #35 is produced jointly by EURAF, and the AgoForAdapt and DigitAF Projects.. The report gives a detailed description of agroforestry policies and practices in France, outlining how the intentional integration of trees with crops or livestock is supported by national frameworks and the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Agroforestry is a crucial land use in France, covering approximately 1.55 million hectares. Under the CAP Strategic Plan, these systems are eligible for direct area payments. On arable land, eligibility requires tree density to remain under 100 trees per hectare, while on pastoral land, a more complicated pro-rata system, poses a risk for farmers of losing entitlements if the tree or shrub cover on a parcel is too great. France utilises Eco-schemes to reward biodiversity infrastructure financially, such as the "Bonus Haie" for maintaining hedgerows, and the CAP includes performance metrics like committing 3.7 million hectares to climate adaptation. Beyond agricultural subsidies, the briefing explores the intersection of agroforestry with other policy frameworks like the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) Regulation and the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). France leverages the voluntary carbon market through its state-backed "Label Bas-Carbone," providing a methodology for farmers to monetize carbon sequestration from hedges and orchards. France's agroforestry sector is supported by research institutions like INRAE, a structured civil society network, and the "Pacte en faveur de la haie," which aimed at a net gain of 50,000 kilometers of hedges by 2030, but for which funding was severely cut in 2025. Opportunities include utilizing trees as a climate adaptation strategy to shade livestock and crops, and expanding local bioeconomy supply chains. However, structural barriers hinder wider adoption. The "Statut du Fermage" (Tenant Farming Statute) requires tenant farmers to secure landowner permission to plant trees, effectively blocking investments on rented land. Farmers also face challenges with the complex "Telepac" administrative system, unpredictable budget volatility, a shortage of technical advisors, and an economic "Valley of Death" during the early years of tree establishment. Biological vulnerabilities from pests and land competition from agrivoltaics pose additional threats. The report concludes with 20 actionable recommendations for policymakers, highlighting the need to reform tenant farming laws, to remove contradictory incentives, to establish a localized "one-stop shop" (guichet unique) to help farmers navigate complex grants, and to secure stable, long-term funding which ensures sustainable maintenance of planted trees. Une traduction en français de la note d'orientation n° 35 est en préparation

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。