Digital Government Construction, High-Quality Development of the Low-Altitude Economy, and Regional Energy Intensity: Evidence from the Development of China’s Low-Altitude Future Industry
デジタル政府構築、低空経済の質の高い発展、および地域エネルギー強度:中国の低空未来産業の発展からの証拠 (AI 翻訳)
Yujie Lang, Shiyi Zhu, Mingchao Yin, Ruitao Cai, Kun Lv
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、中国の省パネルデータを用いて、デジタル政府構築と低空経済(LAE)の質的発展が地域エネルギー強度に与える影響を分析。空間差分差分モデルと二重機械学習により、両者が直接的にエネルギー強度を抑制し、LAEが媒介効果を持つことを実証。産業次元が基盤的役割を果たす。
English
Using Chinese provincial panel data (2012-2022), this study examines how digital government construction and high-quality development of the low-altitude economy (LAE) affect regional energy intensity. Employing spatial DID and double machine learning models, it finds direct inhibitory effects and a mediating role of LAE, with the industrial dimension being foundational.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の「双炭」目標達成に向けた政策研究だが、日本でもデジタルガバメントと新産業(ドローン等)によるエネルギー効率向上の可能性を示唆。SSBJやGX政策への直接的な接点は薄いが、政策連携の参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper offers empirical evidence from China on how digital government and emerging industries (low-altitude economy) can reduce energy intensity. It contributes to global discussions on policy integration for energy transition, though its China-specific setting limits direct applicability.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The study provides a methodological framework (SDID, DML) and empirical evidence on the mechanisms linking digital governance and industrial development to energy efficiency.
🏢実務担当者:Corporations involved in digital transformation or low-altitude economy (e.g., drones) can learn how policy support and industrial development may influence energy intensity.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can gain insights into designing integrated policies that combine digital government reforms with support for emerging industries to achieve energy intensity targets.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Mitigating energy intensity stands as a core linchpin for fulfilling China’s “dual carbon” strategic goals and facilitating the low-carbon green transition of the economic system. Against the backdrop of the in-depth convergence of the digital economy and the real economy, a critical unresolved research question persists: whether and through what pathways digital government construction can improve energy utilization efficiency by enabling the development of emerging strategic industries. Against this background, this study systematically investigates the combined effects and intrinsic transmission mechanisms between digital government construction, the high-quality development of the low-altitude economy (hereafter referred to as LAE), and regional energy intensity. Specifically, this study addresses four core research gaps: first, whether digital government construction can exert a direct curbing effect on energy intensity; second, what functional role the high-quality development of the LAE plays in this causal relationship; third, whether spatial spillover effects exist between the two core factors on regional energy intensity; and fourth, whether the industrial, market, and policy dimensions of LAE development have heterogeneous influences in the above transmission mechanism. To answer the above research questions, this study constructs a unified analytical framework that incorporates digital government construction, high-quality LAE development, and regional energy intensity. We employ panel data covering 30 provinces in China from 2012 to 2022, taking the institutional reform of provincial big data management authorities as a quasi-natural experiment to identify the policy effects of digital government construction. Meanwhile, we build a comprehensive evaluation system to quantify the high-quality development level of the LAE from three core dimensions: industrial development, market maturity, and policy support. On this basis, the spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model and double machine learning (DML) model are adopted to carry out systematic empirical tests. The empirical results reveal the following core findings: First, both digital government construction and the high-quality development of the LAE have a significant direct inhibitory effect on regional energy intensity. Second, the spatial spillover effects of the two factors present pronounced heterogeneous characteristics: the radiation effect of digital government construction on adjacent regions depends on the dual premise of geographical proximity and economic development similarity, while the technology spillover effect of LAE development can be effectively realized under the single condition of economic similarity. Third, the high-quality development of the LAE plays a significant mediating role in the causal chain of digital government construction affecting regional energy intensity, and this transmission mechanism remains statistically robust after a series of robustness tests, including algorithm replacement, adjustment of sample splitting ratios, and exclusion of interference from concurrent policy shocks. Fourth, further decomposition tests of the transmission path demonstrate that the industrial dimension plays the most core and fundamental role, acting as the “material basis” for transforming the governance efficiency of digital government into actual energy-saving effects, while the market and policy dimensions function as key supporting collaborative mechanisms, whose transmission intensity is highly dependent on the foundation of industrial development. This study unpacks the intrinsic transmission mechanism through which digital government construction enables the LAE to curb regional energy intensity, offering solid theoretical underpinnings and actionable policy implications for emerging market economies to advance energy “dual control” targets and foster the development of new quality productive forces.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104657first seen 2026-05-17 07:17:11 · last seen 2026-05-20 05:16:19
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。