Breaking Rework Chains in Low-Carbon Prefabrication: A Hybrid Evolutionary Scheduling Framework
低炭素プレハブ工法における手戻り連鎖の打破:ハイブリッド進化的スケジューリングフレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
Yixuan Tang, Xintong Li, Yingwen Yu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、プレハブ建築における低炭素化と効率性のバランスを取るため、積極的な品質検査計画と低炭素プロジェクト実行を統合した二段階スケジューリングフレームワークを提案。カスケード状の手戻り連鎖を予防的に遮断することで、従来の受動的対策と比較してGTCを40.8%削減。炭素税の感度分析も行い、規制圧力下での実践的知見を提供。
English
This study proposes a proactive bi-level scheduling framework for low-carbon prefabricated construction, integrating quality inspection planning with carbon-constrained project execution. Using a hybrid evolutionary algorithm, it achieves a 40.8% reduction in generalized total cost with only 5.4% preventive investment, demonstrating a shift from reactive remediation to active prevention. Sensitivity analysis on carbon tax rates provides insights for managers.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の建設業界でもカーボンニュートラルへの対応が求められる中、本論文はプレハブ工法のスケジューリングに炭素排出コストを組み込む手法を示しており、建設会社の環境経営やサプライチェーン最適化に示唆を与える。特に、予防的投資の有効性を定量的に示す点が実務上有用。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on low-carbon construction by offering an operational framework that internalizes carbon costs into scheduling decisions. It bridges the gap between reactive rescheduling and proactive quality management, with practical implications for industries facing carbon pricing mechanisms.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers in construction management and operational research will find the hybrid evolutionary algorithm and the bi-level optimization model a novel contribution to low-carbon scheduling.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams in construction can use the framework to evaluate trade-offs between quality inspection investment and carbon reduction benefits.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers designing carbon pricing mechanisms can note the sensitivity analysis showing how different tax rates influence project-level decisions.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Achieving sustainability in prefabricated construction necessitates a balance between operational efficiency and stringent environmental constraints. However, cascading rework chains triggered by assembly defects frequently disrupt this equilibrium. Existing literature predominantly addresses this dynamic through reactive rescheduling, thereby largely overlooking the potential of proactive topological interception. To bridge this gap, this study proposes a proactive bi-level scheduling framework that mathematically integrates strategic quality inspection planning with operational low-carbon project execution. Specifically, a Generalized Total Cost (GTC) model is formulated to internalize multi-objective trade-offs—including time, cost, and carbon emissions—into a unified financial metric through market-based shadow prices. This framework is operationalized through a novel bi-level Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm (H-TS-CDBO). By combining the global exploration capabilities of Chaotic Dung Beetle Optimization with the local refinement mechanisms of Tabu Search, the proposed solver is specifically engineered to navigate the topological ruggedness induced by proactive inspection interventions. Empirical benchmarking validates the computational robustness of the solver, while an illustrative case study substantiates a critical managerial paradigm shift from “passive remediation” to “active prevention”: compared to traditional methods, a marginal preventive investment of 5.4% functions as an effective containment mechanism, yielding a 40.8% net reduction in the GTC. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis regarding varying static carbon tax rates simulates algorithmic adaptation under diverse regulatory intensity thresholds, delineating an actionable pathway for project managers to achieve lean, low-carbon synergy amidst evolving regulatory pressures.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16050968first seen 2026-05-15 17:21:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。