Climate Change as a Non-Traditional Security Threat: Rethinking Global Security Paradigms.
非伝統的安全保障脅威としての気候変動：グローバル安全保障パラダイムの再考 (AI 翻訳)
Swati Chongder
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
気候変動を非伝統的安全保障脅威と位置づけ、従来の軍事中心の安全保障パラダイムでは不十分であると論じる。チャド、シリア、イラク、米国などの事例から、異常気象や資源不足が食料・水・健康・生計を脅かし、避難民や社会不安を引き起こすことを示す。北極海の氷融解や中東の紛争など、環境変化と地政学的緊張の連関を指摘し、気候正義と安全保障の接続を強調する。
English
This paper frames climate change as a non-traditional security threat, arguing that traditional military-focused security paradigms are insufficient. Using cases from Chad, Syria, Iraq, and the US, it shows how extreme weather and resource scarcity disrupt food, water, health, and livelihoods, leading to displacement and social unrest. It highlights the convergence of environmental change with geopolitical tensions, such as Arctic ice melt and Middle East conflicts, and emphasizes the link between climate justice and security.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策では、気候変動を安全保障問題として捉える視点はまだ限定的だが、エネルギー安全保障や防災の文脈で関連性が高まる可能性がある。本稿は、SSBJや有報での気候リスク開示において、物理的リスクの社会的影響を考察する際の参考となる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on climate security, aligning with frameworks like the World Economic Forum's global risks report and US threat assessments. It provides a conceptual basis for integrating climate risks into national security strategies, relevant for policymakers and researchers working on climate risk disclosure and adaptation planning.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive overview of climate change as a security threat, useful for framing interdisciplinary research.
🏛政策担当者:Offers arguments for integrating climate change into national security and foreign policy frameworks.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change has transitioned from being primarily an environmental issue to a significant non-traditional security threat, with extensive implications for human welfare, economic stability, and geopolitical dynamics. Traditional security paradigms, which concentrate on military threats and the sovereignty of states, are increasingly insufficient in tackling dangers that stem from extreme weather phenomena, resource shortages, and ecological decline. Evidence from areas such as Chad, Syria, Iraq, and the United States illustrates that droughts, floods, heatwaves, and storms disrupt food systems, water resources, health services, and livelihoods, resulting in displacement, social unrest, and increased vulnerability. On a global scale, the melting of Arctic ice and the competition for strategic resources, along with climate-sensitive conflicts in the Middle East, highlight the convergence of environmental change with geopolitical tensions and militarization. Moreover, contemporary warfare and energy dependencies intensify the impacts of climate change, creating feedback loops that further destabilize regions. Disparities in climate resilience, especially in developing countries, underscore the dangers posed by cuts in climate assistance and unequal adaptive capacities, emphasizing the connection between climate injustice and global security. The 2025 U.S. Threat Assessment, along with reports from the World Economic Forum and the World Meteorological Organization, indicates that environmental threats are now among the most urgent long-term global risks, underscoring the need to incorporate human security into policy frameworks. This paper contends that effective responses to climate change necessitate comprehensive strategies that integrate disaster preparedness, transitions to renewable energy, humanitarian aid, and international cooperation. Acknowledging climate change as a core security issue is crucial for mitigating cascading risks, protecting vulnerable populations, and fostering a resilient, equitable, and stable global order
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19437524first seen 2026-05-05 19:11:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。