Institutionalizing Benefit-Sharing in an Island Energy Transition: The Case of Shinan County, South Korea
島嶼エネルギー移行における利益共有の制度化：韓国・新安郡の事例 (AI 翻訳)
Sung-Hyun Park, Sun-Kee Hong
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、韓国新安郡の再生可能エネルギー利益共有システムを公正な移行の観点から分析し、制度的持続可能性を評価した。分配的正義よりも手続き的正義が住民満足度に強く影響し、認識的正義と地理的制約が正当性の認識を媒介することを示した。長期的な持続可能性は経済的規模よりも、参加型のガバナンスと透明性に依存する。
English
This study examines the legitimacy and institutional sustainability of Shinan County's renewable energy benefit-sharing system in South Korea through a just transition lens. It finds that procedural justice more strongly influences resident satisfaction than distributive outcomes, with recognition justice and locational conditions mediating perceptions. Long-term sustainability depends more on participatory governance and transparency than on financial magnitude.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は韓国の事例だが、日本の離島や地域における再生可能エネルギー導入と住民との利益共有制度の設計に示唆を与える。日本のGX政策においても公正な移行が重視されており、手続き的正義の重要性は示唆的である。
In the global GX context
This paper provides an integrated analytical framework for evaluating community-based benefit-sharing systems, contributing to the global just transition discourse. The finding that procedural justice outweighs distributive outcomes in resident satisfaction is valuable for energy transition governance worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers an analytical framework linking justice dimensions to institutional sustainability in energy transitions.
🏢実務担当者:Insights on designing benefit-sharing mechanisms that prioritize procedural justice and transparency over mere financial compensation.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of participatory governance and recognition justice in renewable energy policies, especially for geographically constrained communities.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines the legitimacy and institutional sustainability of Shinan County’s renewable energy benefit-sharing system in South Korea from the perspective of a just transition. Moving beyond viewing benefit-sharing as a mere compensatory or distributive policy, the study conceptualizes it as a rule-constituted governance mechanism grounded in commons-based resource use. By integrating institutional analysis with the three core dimensions of justice—distributive, procedural, and recognition justice—this research analyzes how ordinance-based rules, participation structures, and perceptions of fairness interact to shape policy sustainability and scalability. Using qualitative document analysis and secondary synthesis of empirical studies, the paper demonstrates that procedural justice exerts a stronger influence on resident satisfaction than the scale of monetary distribution. Recognition justice and locational conditions further mediate perceptions of legitimacy, particularly in geographically constrained island contexts. While Shinan’s distance-based differentiated compensation and resident participation model institutionalize distributive rationality, they may also generate boundary and equity debates if perceived as legitimizing devices rather than as substantively fair arrangements. The findings suggest that long-term sustainability depends less on financial magnitude than on participatory architecture, governance transparency, and capacity-building infrastructures. The study contributes to island studies and energy transition scholarship by proposing an integrated analytical framework for evaluating community-based benefit-sharing systems in vulnerable regions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.21463/jmic.2026.15.1.12first seen 2026-05-21 04:27:53
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。