gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Industrial policy for unlocking the potential of the green energy transition in Serbia

セルビアにおけるグリーンエネルギー移行の可能性を引き出すための産業政策 (AI 翻訳)

D. Đuričin, A. Kovačević

Economics of Enterprise📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-01-01#エネルギー転換
DOI: 10.5937/ekopre2602001d
原典: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekopre2602001d

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は市場原理主義の欠陥を批判し、セルビアのグリーンエネルギー移行を加速するための産業政策を提案。バイオマス、CCUS、EVバリューチェーン、送電網最適化など多様な技術への投資を促進する政策ミックスを分析する。セルビアの経済準備状況を評価し、具体的なプロジェクトポートフォリオを提示。

English

This paper critiques market fundamentalism and proposes an industrial policy for Serbia's green energy transition. It analyzes investment characteristics for biomass, CCUS, EV value chain, and grid optimization, and presents a project portfolio for the country.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

セルビアの事例は直接日本の政策には適用できないが、産業政策とグリーン移行の統合、バイオマスやCCUSを含む多様な技術ミックスの重要性は示唆的。特に、中所得国の移行戦略として参考になる点がある。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global discussions on industrial policy for green transitions, offering a heterodox economic perspective and a detailed case study of a middle-income European country. It covers investment specifics for biomass and CCUS, relevant for emerging economies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:The paper provides a critique of neoliberalism and a heterodox policy framework for green transition, relevant for scholars of political economy and energy policy.

🏢実務担当者:Limited direct applicability, but the project portfolio and policy mix can inspire similar strategies for corporate sustainability teams in emerging markets.

🏛政策担当者:Offers a comprehensive policy platform for green energy transition in developing economies, including specific recommendations for biomass and CCUS investments.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Market fundamentalism (or neoliberalism) has proven to be a crisisprone economic model. Within this model, a number of in-built structural imbalances and their interactions have contributed to a downward spiral in economic performance. The end point of this evolution is a multi-crisis in which geopolitics has become an integral macroeconomic variable. Because geopolitics does not function as an antidote but rather as a remedy with predominantly counterproductive effects, the global economy has persistently lost recovery momentum and slipped into deeper crises, while human society simultaneously undergoes geopolitical regression. In such a context, preserving strategic autonomy becomes a particularly demanding task for any national economy. For Serbia, as a small, open, middle-income, landlocked economy on a convergence path toward the EU, this challenge is especially pronounced. These days, strategic autonomy entails a clear vision for accelerating the green transition through a new industrialization based on climate-neutral technologies, primarily in the energy sector and land-use industries. In this paper, we explore key insights into the efforts required to energize the green transition as a roadmap for reversing, or at the very least decelerating, the adverse dynamics of the current economic conjuncture. Serbia serves as the focal point of this analysis, with particular emphasis on the green energy transition as a critical pillar of this complex endeavor. The authors hope that the proposed platform for the green energy transition will be recognized as both feasible and implementable. The zero step in Serbia’s green energy transition is the build-up of a nature-centric mindset capable of fostering a so-called “ecological civilization” in the near future. To achieve this, two coordination mechanisms must be combined: the invisible hand of the market and the visible hand of the state. The paper also addresses two additional issues. First, it examines the specific characteristics of investments in biomass-based energy technologies. Second, it analyzes the policy mix required to stimulate investment in related technologies for renewable energy and land-use industries, carbon capture and utilization, grid optimization, lithium production, and other sectors integral to the green transition (e.g., the EV value chain). Building on the preceding line of reasoning, the paper is organized into five main sections, in addition to the Introduction and Conclusion. Part 1 examines the root causes and key deficiencies of market fundamentalism. Part 2 discusses the necessity of the green transition as a pathway toward ecological civilization. Part 3 elaborates a “to-be” scenario for Serbia, based on a circular growth model and a heterodox economic policy platform. Part 4 assesses Serbia’s economic preparedness for the green energy transition. Finally, Part 5, the paper’s pivotal section, presents a portfolio of green energy projects, providing detailed explanations of biomass-based energy production, which is proposed as the flagship project within Serbia’s broader green energy transition agenda.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。