Bio-Based Carbon Capture and Utilization Opportunities in Poland: A Preliminary Assessment
ポーランドにおけるバイオベースの炭素回収・利用機会：予備的評価 (AI 翻訳)
M. Strojny, P. Gładysz, Amy Brunsvold, A. Magdziarz
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はポーランドのエネルギー部門におけるBECCUS（バイオエネルギー＋CCUS）の技術・環境・経済性を評価。貯留、鉱物化、メタノール合成の3経路を比較し、レベル化コストは貯留が最も低く、炭素フットプリントは貯留が最大のマイナスを示した。日本でもCCUS戦略に示唆を与える。
English
This study evaluates techno-environmental performance of BECCUS pathways in Poland: CO2 storage, mineralization, and methanol synthesis. Levelized costs range from 59.9 to 631.1 EUR/tCO2,in, with storage achieving the most negative carbon footprint (-936.4 kgCO2-eq/tCO2,in). The trade-offs between cost and climate performance inform CCUS deployment strategies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもCCUSはGX実現の鍵として注目されており、ポーランドの実証データは日本の地質・産業条件への適用可能性を検討する際の参考となる。特にBECCSによるマイナス排出の実現可能性は、日本の長期脱炭素戦略にとって重要。
In the global GX context
Global CCUS deployment faces similar techno-economic hurdles; this Polish case study provides granular cost and emissions data for BECCUS pathways. The findings reinforce the need for policy support to bridge the gap between cheap storage and costly utilization, a key debate in international climate policy.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Detailed cost and carbon footprint comparison of BECCUS pathways provides benchmarks for CCUS modeling and life-cycle assessment.
🏢実務担当者:Companies exploring CCUS investments can use the levelized costs and emission factors to evaluate project viability and technology selection.
🏛政策担当者:Evidence of net-negative emissions from BECCS supports inclusion of CCUS in national climate strategies and subsidy design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) play an increasingly important role in climate mitigation strategies by addressing industrial emissions and enabling pathways toward net-negative emissions. A key challenge lies in determining the pathway of captured CO2, whether through permanent geological storage or conversion into value-added products to enhance system viability. As hard-to-abate sectors and the power industry remain major sources of emissions, a comprehensive assessment of the technical, environmental, and economic performance of CCUS pathways is essential. This study evaluates bioenergy with carbon capture and storage/utilization (BECCUS) in the context of the Polish energy sector. Techno-environmental performance was assessed across three pathways: CO2 storage in saline formations, CO2 mineralization, and methanol synthesis. The results show levelized costs of 59.9 EUR/tCO2,in for storage, 109.7 EUR/tCO2,in for mineralization, and 631.1 EUR/tCO2,in for methanol production. Corresponding carbon footprints (including full chain emissions) were −936.4 kgCO2-eq/tCO2,in for storage, −460.6 kgCO2-eq/tCO2,in in for mineralization, and 3963.4 kgCO2-eq/tCO2,in for methanol synthesis. These values highlight the trade-offs between economic viability and climate performance across utilization and storage options. The analysis underscores the potential of BECCS to deliver net-negative emissions and supports strategic planning for CCUS deployment in Poland.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/en19020355first seen 2026-05-05 23:33:37
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。