Climate oversight in the world’s largest investment portfolios
世界最大の投資ポートフォリオにおける気候監督 (AI 翻訳)
B. Fakhruddin, Sultana Jahangir
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、世界最大の年金基金とソブリン・ウェルス・ファンド（SWF）における気候対応の実態を分析する。これらの機関は数十兆ドルを運用するが、気候関連投資への配分は限定的であり、カーボン・フットプリントや移行準備態勢の指標を用いた分析では、ネットゼロ達成に必要な水準を大幅に下回っている。エンゲージメントや政策的枠組みの改善が求められる。
English
This Perspective examines climate oversight in the world's largest pension and sovereign wealth funds. Using a harmonized disclosure framework and composite climate-risk proxies, it reveals a persistent climate finance gap, with most funds far below allocation levels needed for net-zero alignment. The study argues for strategic capital reallocation to reduce transition and physical climate risk.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は、GPIFを含む国際的な機関投資家の気候ガバナンス実態を比較分析しており、日本のSSBJや統合報告書における開示基準の強化、投資家の気候関連リスク管理に重要な示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a global benchmark for climate oversight in institutional investing, offering a framework that aligns with TCFD, ISSB, and net-zero commitments. It highlights the structural gap in climate-aligned capital allocation, relevant for regulators and asset owners under CSRD and SEC climate disclosure rules.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Contributes to climate finance literature by quantifying the gap and proposing a disclosure-based analytical framework.
🏢実務担当者:Offers institutional investors a reference to benchmark their climate allocation and risk exposure against peers.
🏛政策担当者:Provides evidence for strengthening mandatory climate disclosure and alignment with global net-zero targets.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This Perspective examines climate oversight in the world’s largest pension and sovereign wealth funds. These institutions collectively manage tens of trillions of dollars, yet they remain structurally under-allocated to climate-aligned investments. Conventional equities, bonds, and real assets still dominate their portfolios, while assets identifiable as low-carbon, climate solution, or otherwise sustainability-related usually account for only a modest share of total holdings. The misalignment reflects governance and portfolio design constraints, including benchmark dependence, fiduciary interpretation, legacy sectoral exposures, and, in some sovereign funds, continued fiscal linkage to fossil fuel revenues. This article compares climate-aligned allocation levels and climate-risk exposure across 15 major pension and sovereign wealth funds using a harmonized public-disclosure framework and a composite climate-risk proxy derived from governance strength, carbon intensity, and transition readiness. The analysis reveals a persistent climate finance gap, with most funds far below the allocation levels required to align with global net-zero pathways. The findings support the argument that climate finance should be understood as a mechanism of strategic capital reallocation through which institutional investors can reduce transition and physical climate risk while enhancing long term portfolio resilience. This article contributes to the literature on sustainability-oriented financial transformation by clarifying the governance logic of persistent carbon exposure and by documenting the scale and structure of the climate finance gap in the world’s largest investment portfolios.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2026.1840812first seen 2026-06-27 05:20:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。