gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

The Evolution and Integration of ESG Reporting: A Framework for Sustainable Business Accountability

ESG報告の進化と統合:持続可能な企業説明責任のためのフレームワーク (AI 翻訳)

G. Aguiar

Business Strategy and the Environment📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-24#開示インフラOrigin: Global対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.1002/bse.71189
原典: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71189

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、MicrosoftとUnilever(2020-2023)のESG報告を比較し、GRI、SASB、TCFD、CSRD、IFRS S1/S2などの基準の統合を分析。Microsoftは投資家志向の透明性と気候リスクガバナンスを重視し、Unileverは人権とサプライチェーン倫理を強調。両社にナラティブ開示と検証のギャップが見られ、統合モデルを提案。

English

This study compares ESG reporting by Microsoft and Unilever (2020-2023) analyzing integration of GRI, SASB, TCFD, CSRD, and IFRS S1/S2. Microsoft adopts investor-oriented transparency and climate-risk governance, while Unilever emphasizes human rights and supply chain ethics. Both exhibit gaps between narrative disclosure and verification, and proposes an integrated reporting model.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ基準が策定中であり、国際基準との整合性が課題。本論文の統合モデルは、日本の有報でのESG開示や保証強化に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

With ISSB and CSRD driving global convergence, this paper's comparative analysis of leading firms and proposed integrated model offers practical insights for companies navigating multiple disclosure frameworks and assurance requirements.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comparative case study of two major firms adopting multiple ESG frameworks, useful for research on disclosure diffusion and assurance.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a model for integrating multiple reporting standards and strengthening assurance, directly applicable to corporate ESG teams.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights gaps between narrative and verification, informing regulatory efforts to standardize assurance requirements.

📄 Abstract(原文)

This study examines how multinational corporations incorporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting frameworks to foster trust, enhance legitimacy, and move beyond mere symbolic disclosure. A qualitative comparison of Microsoft and Unilever from 2020 to 2023 assesses how both firms integrate leading standards, including GRI, SASB, TCFD, CSRD, and IFRS S1/S2, in response to rising regulatory pressure and stakeholder expectations. Drawing on sustainability reports, assurance statements, financial filings, and third‐party assessments, the findings demonstrate that Microsoft adopts an investor‐oriented approach characterized by data transparency, digital traceability, and climate‐risk governance. Unilever adopts a socially grounded strategy that emphasizes human rights, supply chain ethics, and stakeholder engagement. Despite differences, both companies exhibit gaps where narrative disclosure outpaces verification. The article proposes an integrated ESG reporting model that harmonizes standards, strengthens assurance, and embeds ESG into governance and financial decision‐making to support more accountable and comparable sustainability reporting.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。