Depoliticizing the energy transition: Reflections on the “Texas model”
脱政治化するエネルギー移行：「テキサス・モデル」の考察 (AI 翻訳)
Casey A. Williams
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、テキサス州の再生可能エネルギー（RE）ブームを説明する「テキサス・モデル」、すなわち規制緩和と市場原理がRE導入を促進するという言説を批判的に分析する。著者は、このモデルが資本主義の枠組み内での気候危機解決を主張する議論として構築されていることを示す。しかし実際には、テキサスのREはデータセンターや石油産業の拡大に利用されており、高炭素経済の補完物に過ぎないと論じる。結論として、テキサス・モデルは資本主義のエネルギー需要と人間の福祉の間の矛盾を空想的に解決する「幻想」として機能すると指摘する。
English
This article critically examines the 'Texas Model'—the narrative that deregulation and market forces drive renewable energy growth. It argues that this model is constructed to support a depoliticized, market-driven transition narrative. However, Texas's renewable energy actually supports data centers and oil expansion, supplementing high-carbon economy. The model is a fantasy resolving the contradiction between capitalist energy demands and ecological well-being.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のエネルギー転換議論においても、技術的・経済的解決に焦点が当たりがちだが、本論文は政治的决定の重要性を再認識させる。日本のGX政策が市場メカニズムに依存する側面を批判的に検討する材料となる。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a critical lens on the depoliticized narrative of energy transition, challenging the assumption that market forces alone can achieve decarbonization. It is relevant for global debates on the political economy of energy transition, especially in regions like the EU and US where market-based approaches are prominent.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a critical framework for analyzing depoliticized narratives in energy transition research.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the risk of relying solely on market mechanisms; suggests that political choices are inevitable in energy transition.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Texas has become an unlikely protagonist of the global energy transition. The most common explanation given for Texas's renewable energy (RE) boom is that the state imposes few restrictions on capital. The apparent success of what the authors of a Columbia Business School report call the “Texas Model”—lax permitting rules for energy projects and a deregulated electricity market—is frequently taken as evidence that “economics, not politics” can shift electricity production away from fossil fuels at the pace required to keep planetary heating to tolerable levels. For “transition optimists”—political and business leaders, researchers, and journalists who contend that an energy transition is possible without social, political, or economic upheaval—Texas has become a crucial symbol, standing in for the salutary power of free markets and the possibility of achieving a low-carbon future without political conflict. Drawing on journalistic writing, political commentary, and economic studies pertaining to energy transition in Texas, this article suggests that the “Texas Model” underpins an influential narrative about global energy transition—one that views market forces, rather than political choices, as the decisive factor driving a shift to renewables. It shows how authors construct the Texas Model by assembling a set of facts about Texas's regulatory regime into an argument (a) supporting deregulation as strategy for adding renewable electricity capacity and (b) contending that capitalism is uniquely capable of resolving the climate crisis. However, Texas's RE projects are increasingly used to support data center, cryptocurrency, and oil industry expansion, suggesting that Texas's RE boom ought to be seen as a supplement rather than a challenge to high-carbon forms of political economy. The article concludes that the Texas Model ultimately functions as a “piece of fantasy” that speculatively resolves the enduring contradiction between the energy demands of capitalism and the ecological requirements of human well-being.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486261428291first seen 2026-05-15 17:19:51
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。