Carbon Fiscal Policies and UK Economy —Evidence from Small Open Economy DSGE
炭素財政政策と英国経済—小国開放経済DSGEからのエビデンス (AI 翻訳)
Zhiqi Zhao, Zheyi Zhu, Ziqing Wang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、英国の炭素税・補助金政策のマクロ経済効果を分析するため、小国開放経済の環境DSGEモデルを開発・推定した。炭素外部性、企業の排出削減行動、および政府の税収還元を組み込み、ベイズ推定により実証的に検証。炭素価格政策がインフレ、生産、国際競争力に与える影響を明らかにし、持続可能な移行政策の設計に貢献する。
English
This paper develops and estimates a small open-economy environmental DSGE model for the UK to analyze the macroeconomic effects of carbon fiscal policies. It incorporates carbon externalities, firm-level abatement, and revenue recycling, and uses Bayesian methods on UK quarterly data (2000-2024). The results show how carbon taxes and subsidies impact inflation, output, and external competitiveness, providing insights for balancing environmental goals with economic stability.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも炭素価格制度(試行的ETS・化石燃料賦課金)が導入されつつあり、英国の統合的政策設計とそのマクロ効果の分析は、日本の政策運営(例:温暖化対策税の活用、カーボンプライシングの成長・物価への影響)に直接的な示唆を与える。SSBJ開示とも関連し、企業の移行計画の前提となるマクロ環境を理解するうえで有益。
In the global GX context
As countries implement carbon pricing and green fiscal policies, the UK's integrated approach—carbon tax, ETS, and subsidies—offers a valuable case study. This paper's DSGE framework quantifies trade-offs between emission reduction and macroeconomic stability, relevant for global policy debates on carbon pricing design, revenue recycling, and competitiveness. The findings inform discussions under ISSB and TCFD frameworks regarding scenario analysis and transition planning.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:A rigorous empirical DSGE model for carbon policy analysis, demonstrating integration of environmental and macroeconomic channels with Bayesian estimation.
🏢実務担当者:Provides quantitative evidence on how carbon pricing affects inflation, output, and competitiveness, useful for corporate scenario planning and sustainability strategy.
🏛政策担当者:Offers insights for designing carbon tax and subsidy schemes that minimize transitional costs while achieving emission targets, with applications to other open economies.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Through legislated carbon budgets and a legally binding Net Zero target for 2050, the UK has institutionalised emission reduction as a central macro-fiscal priority. However, market forces alone are unlikely to deliver the speed and scale of decarbonisation required. Government intervention remains essential, and the policy challenge lies in balancing environmental urgency with economic stability. The UK’s carbon policy architecture reflects a sequenced design: the Climate Change Levy (2001), the Carbon Price Support (2013), and the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (2021) on the pricing side; and, on the subsidy side, support for renewable deployment beginning with Feed-in Tariffs in 2010 and evolving into broader grant and risk-sharing programmes. While empirical studies have documented important micro-level effects—including reductions in energy intensity (Martin et al., 2014), lifestyle-based differences in household carbon footprints (Druckman & Jackson, 2009), and institutional barriers to firm-level abatement (Renukappa et al., 2013): the macroeconomic transmission of UK carbon policy remains insufficiently understood. Recent UK-focused macro models show that carbon taxes and fossil-fuel bans reduce emissions but may raise inflation and impose transitional output losses (Batten & Millard, 2024). Yet a comprehensive, UK-calibrated small open-economy DSGE framework that jointly models carbon taxation, revenue recycling, exchange-rate dynamics, and external balance has been missing.We address this gap by developing and estimating a small open-economy environmental DSGE (E-DSGE) model tailored to the UK. The model incorporates explicit carbon externalities, Armington (1969) trade structure, and firm-level abatement behaviour. The government levies a carbon tax, recycles the revenues through targeted green subsidies, and influences firms’ incentives to invest in low-carbon technologies. The model integrates environmental and macroeconomic channels in a unified structure that captures relative price dynamics, competitiveness effects, and external adjustment. To ensure empirical discipline, we estimate the model with Bayesian methods using quarterly data from 2000Q1 to 2024Q4. This provides a robust platform for studying the macroeconomic, environmental, and external-balance consequences of alternative carbon-policy paths.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.25401/cardiffmet.32324244.v1first seen 2026-06-07 04:40:56
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。