Smart grids and energy democracy: how households are represented in Swedish energy policymaking
スマートグリッドとエネルギーデモクラシー:スウェーデンのエネルギー政策決定における家庭の代表のされ方 (AI 翻訳)
Jenny Palm, Katharina Reindl
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、スウェーデンのスマートグリッド政策における家庭の代表のされ方を、エネルギーデモクラシーの枠組みを用いて分析。政策文書とインタビューの定性分析から、技術的・市場中心の論理が社会的不平等や民主的包摂を軽視していることを明らかにし、多様な家庭視点の統合の重要性を主張する。
English
This paper examines how households are represented in Swedish smart grid policymaking, using an energy democracy framework. Qualitative analysis of policy documents and interviews reveals a dominance of technocratic and market-based logics that overlook socio-material inequalities and democratic inclusion, arguing for integrating diverse household perspectives.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
スウェーデンの事例ではあるが、日本でもスマートグリッド導入に伴う家庭の役割や政策形成プロセスにおける代表性の問題が関心事であり、日本版エネルギーデモクラシー議論への示唆を含む。
In the global GX context
The paper contributes to the global energy democracy literature by critically examining the gap between policy expectations and institutional practice in smart grid deployment, relevant for just transition discussions in EU and other regions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Energy democracy scholars can use the four-dimensional framework (actors, capacity, framing, justice) to analyze household representation in other contexts.
🏛政策担当者:Energy regulators should note the path dependency and lack of diverse household voices in smart grid policy formation.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Smart grids are widely promoted as key technologies for enabling low-carbon and flexible electricity systems, with households expected to play an active role through dynamic pricing and automation. This article examines the representation of households in Swedish energy policymaking. This is done by investigating how households are represented in two policy processes concerning smart grids and grid tariffs in Sweden, as well as through interviews with energy sector actors. The qualitative analysis of the documents and interviews reveals a significant gap between policy expectations and institutional practice. Using an energy democracy framework, we analyse household representation across four dimensions: actors and representation, capacity and responsibility, framing, and justice. Our findings point to a dominance of technocratic and market-based logics that overlook socio-material inequalities and democratic inclusion. Over time, the policy processes have relied heavily on the same professional actors, which contributes to the same issues being raised and the same answers being given. Both problems and solutions follow a path dependency in the processes, and the involved actors seem unable to introduce new ideas or solutions to the known problems. We argue that integrating diverse household perspectives is crucial for socially legitimate and equitable energy policies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32254429.v1first seen 2026-05-31 04:39:54 · last seen 2026-06-11 04:52:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。