Enabling change and innovation in marine governance: Lessons learnt from the Danish Bornholm Energy Island
海洋ガバナンスにおける変革とイノベーションの実現：デンマーク・ボーンホルムエネルギーアイランドからの教訓 (AI 翻訳)
Sun Cole Seeberg Dyremose, Carolijn van Noort, Peter Sorknæs, Daniele Pagani
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、デンマークのボーンホルムエネルギーアイランド（BEI）プロジェクトを事例に、海洋ガバナンスにおける変革と停滞の条件を分析。多層的協働海洋ガバナンスモデルを用いて、利害関係者の動機の断片化、情報不足、地政学的複雑性がプロジェクトの不確実性と中断を招いたことを明らかにした。将来の洋上エネルギーハブ事業への政策的示唆を提供する。
English
This paper analyzes the enabling and constraining conditions for change, innovation, and stagnation in marine governance, using the Danish Bornholm Energy Island (BEI) as a case study. Applying the Multilayered Collaborative Marine Governance (MLCMG) Model, it finds that fragmented stakeholder motivations, lack of dissemination resources, and geopolitical complexities led to project uncertainties and a temporary pause. The results offer policy directions for future offshore energy hub projects.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも洋上風力発電の導入拡大が進む中、複数主体間のガバナンスや利害調整の課題は共通。本稿の分析枠組みと教訓は、日本の海洋再生可能エネルギー政策や地域間協調に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a rare empirical analysis of the governance challenges facing large-scale offshore energy hubs, a key element of the European Green Deal. The findings on stakeholder coordination and geopolitical risks are directly relevant to global energy transition governance, especially for multi-country projects like the Baltic Sea network.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:海洋ガバナンスとエネルギー転換の交錯を実証的に示す事例として、協働ガバナンスモデルの適用可能性を評価できる。
🏢実務担当者:洋上風力ハブプロジェクトの計画・実施において、利害関係者との協働や情報共有の重要性を認識するための教訓を得られる。
🏛政策担当者:国際間エネルギーインフラ事業の政策設計において、ガバナンスの脆弱性が事業継続に与える影響を考慮すべきことを示唆。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract In 2020, to meet the European Green Deal goals, Denmark announced the Energy Islands: large-scale transforming stations meant to collect, convert and redistribute energy generated by offshore wind farms. One example is Bornholm Energy Island (BEI), an energy hub placed on the Danish island of Bornholm. BEI is part of a future internationally shared energy network across the Baltic Sea and has received status as a Project of Common Interest within the European Union. However, economic and environmental uncertainties, alongside disagreements about roles and responsibilities between international public institutions and industries, resulted in an indefinite pause of the project in early 2025 and a reimplementation eight months later. To understand these outcomes, this paper explores the enabling and constraining conditions connected to change, innovation, and stagnation in governance of the energy sector, looking specifically at the case of BEI. Data collection and analysis are structured using the Multilayered Collaborative Marine Governance (MLCMG) Model, which focuses on four building blocks of change and innovation in marine governance arrangements: collaboration dynamics, institutional attributes, governance capabilities, and the role of E-governance tools. Results indicate that fragmented stakeholder motivations, the lack of dissemination resources, and a complex geopolitical landscape have led to project uncertainties, increased expenses and a deficiency in stakeholder engagement. The discussion section examines the linkages between the building blocks of change and innovation in the case of BEI, providing direction for policy changes for future offshore energy hub projects.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8437760.v1first seen 2026-05-15 17:15:40
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。