Carbon Neutrality Pathways Through Ecological Restoration: Synergies Between Climate Change Mitigation and Degradation Control
生態系回復によるカーボンニュートラル経路：気候変動緩和と劣化抑制の相乗効果 (AI 翻訳)
Tianzhi Huang, Li Ma, Xuemei Wang, Xiangyuan Sheng, Menglan Huang, Yingyan Wang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、中国の荒廃地における生態系回復経路がカーボンニュートラルと土地劣化中性を同時に達成する最適解を評価する。ファジィ多基準意思決定フレームワークを用い、降水量・土壌水分・有機炭素・植生回復が重要な要因であることを示し、気候適応型回復計画や土壌炭素管理が効果的と結論づけた。
English
This study prioritizes ecological restoration pathways for carbon neutrality and land degradation neutrality in China's degraded landscapes. Using a fuzzy MCDM framework, it identifies precipitation, soil moisture, soil organic carbon, and vegetation recovery as key determinants. Climate-adaptive restoration and enhanced soil carbon management are ranked as most effective for high carbon sequestration.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の事例だが、日本でも森林・湿地回復による炭素吸収源強化はGXに重要。本フレームワークは国内の生態系回復優先順位付けに応用可能。
In the global GX context
This study provides a multi-criteria framework for integrating land restoration into national carbon neutrality strategies, relevant for countries with large degraded areas. It highlights synergies between climate mitigation and land degradation neutrality, aligning with UNCCD and UNFCCC goals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured decision-making approach for prioritizing restoration pathways that maximize carbon sequestration and degradation control.
🏢実務担当者:Land managers and environmental agencies can use the criteria to inform restoration projects.
🏛政策担当者:Offers insights for integrating land restoration as a carbon sink in national climate plans, relevant for NDCs and LDN targets.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Land degradation and climate change represent interconnected global challenges that threaten ecological stability, ecosystem productivity, and long‐term carbon sequestration capacity, particularly in countries with extensive degraded landscapes such as China. This study aims to identify and prioritize ecological restoration pathways that can simultaneously support national carbon‐neutrality goals and advance land degradation neutrality. Despite large‐scale restoration initiatives, uncertainty remains regarding which intervention pathways most effectively generate synergistic benefits for climate mitigation and degradation control, thereby motivating the development of a structured decision‐support framework. We hypothesize that hydrological and soil–vegetation–carbon interactions exert greater influence on restoration‐based carbon neutrality outcomes than purely governance‐oriented measures. To address the inherent uncertainty and multidimensionality of restoration assessment, an integrated Pythagorean fuzzy multi‐criteria decision‐making framework was developed by combining PF‐SWARA and PF‐COPRAS to evaluate multiple criteria and policy support alternatives. The PF‐SWARA results highlight precipitation adequacy, soil moisture retention, soil organic carbon, vegetation recovery, and ecosystem productivity as the most influential determinants of restoration effectiveness, indicating that water availability and soil–vegetation–carbon interactions underpin long‐term restoration outcomes. Using these weighted criteria, the PF‐COPRAS analysis ranked climate‐adaptive restoration planning, enhanced soil carbon management, and wetland and riparian restoration as the most effective pathways for achieving high carbon sequestration and robust degradation control. Grassland rehabilitation and afforestation received moderate utility scores, reflecting their region‐specific performance and hydrological trade‐offs, while governance and finance‐oriented strategies emerged as indirect but essential enabling mechanisms.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70596first seen 2026-05-15 17:23:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。