gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Clean Energy Transition Technologies for Climate-Resilient Development

気候強靭な開発のためのクリーンエネルギー転換技術 (AI 翻訳)

Mohd. Murtaja, S Muthurajan

Crossrefプレプリント2026-02-24#エネルギー転換
DOI: 10.71443/9789349552753-17
原典: https://doi.org/10.71443/9789349552753-17

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本稿は、気候変動への適応と緩和を同時に達成するためのクリーンエネルギー転換技術の統合的分析枠組みを提示。再生可能エネルギー、水素、AI最適化、グリッド近代化、気候資金、カーボンプライシング、水・エネルギー・食料ネクサスなど複数領域を横断し、レジリエンス向上と脱炭素を両立する戦略を論じる。特に極端気象への備えとしてのハイブリッド再エネと蓄電システムの重要性を強調。

English

This chapter presents an integrated analytical framework for clean energy transition technologies that address both climate mitigation and adaptation. It covers hybrid renewables, energy storage, grid hardening, hydrogen economy, AI-driven optimization, climate finance, carbon pricing, and water-energy-food nexus governance. Emphasis is placed on strategies that enhance systemic resilience while advancing deep decarbonization, offering policy and investment directions for developed and emerging economies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本においては、気候変動適応と脱炭素の統合的な取り組みがGX政策の要であり、本稿の枠組みは、有報・統合報告書におけるレジリエンス開示(SSBJ基準)や、水素・蓄電など分野横断的な投資判断の合理化に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This synthesis aligns with global disclosure frameworks (TCFD, ISSB, CSRD) that increasingly require resilience assessment alongside decarbonization. It offers a multi-sector architecture for transition planning, relevant for climate finance taxonomy and infrastructure investment under the Paris Agreement.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive analytical framework connecting resilience, decarbonization, and governance, with identified research gaps for future work.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a menu of technology and policy options for corporate transition planning and climate-risk-informed asset management.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights integrated policy instruments (carbon pricing, climate finance, nexus governance) for designing resilient low-carbon development strategies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Accelerating climate variability, intensifying extreme weather events, and rising resource insecurities demand transformative restructuring of global energy systems beyond conventional decarbonization pathways. Clean energy transition technologies increasingly serve as strategic instruments for climate-resilient development by simultaneously addressing mitigation, adaptation, infrastructure robustness, and socio-economic stability. This chapter advances an integrated analytical framework that connects renewable energy systems, hybrid generation models, advanced energy storage, grid modernization, hydrogen economy pathways, electrification of end-use sectors, digital intelligence, and nexus-based governance approaches within a unified resilience paradigm. Emphasis was placed on hybrid renewable configurations for extreme weather preparedness, storage-enabled grid hardening strategies, AI-driven optimization of electrified systems, and sector coupling through green hydrogen for deep industrial decarbonization. Economic and policy dimensions including climate finance instruments, carbon pricing mechanisms, infrastructure investment models, and regulatory harmonization are critically examined to identify scalable transition pathways across developed and emerging economies. Integrated energy–water–food nexus governance frameworks are explored to address cross-sector resource interdependencies and enhance systemic adaptability under climate uncertainty. The chapter identifies persistent research gaps in resilience metrics, socio-technical integration, and long-term planning under climatic risk scenarios, offering strategic directions for technology deployment, institutional reform, and investment prioritization. The proposed synthesis contributes to advancing evidence-based policymaking and supports the design of resilient, low-carbon, and inclusive energy futures aligned with global climate targets.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。