From Global Mapping to Local Action: Green Finance, Regulatory Frameworks, and Policy Transformation for Sustainable Energy Transition in Qatar and Türkiye
グローバルマッピングからローカルアクションへ：カタールとトルコにおけるグリーンファイナンス、規制枠組み、持続可能なエネルギー移行のための政策変革 (AI 翻訳)
Furkan Ahmad, Ameni Boumaiza, Mehmet Yazici, Nevin Taşaltın, Samet Özmen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、カタールとトルコにおけるグリーンファイナンスの統合を比較分析。カタールは国家主導の大規模グリーンボンド発行（2024年に25億ドル）、トルコは銀行セクター主導とEU準拠のグリーンタクソノミー開発で進む。両国とも民間参加不足や化石燃料依存、開示基準の調和が課題。標準化されたタクソノミーと透明な開示制度による民間資本動員を提言。
English
This paper compares green finance integration in Qatar and Türkiye. Qatar uses sovereign wealth and state-backed green bonds ($2.5B in 2024), while Türkiye advances via banking initiatives and an EU-aligned green taxonomy. Both face challenges: limited private participation, fossil fuel dependence, and need for harmonized disclosure. Recommends standardized taxonomies and transparent disclosure to mobilize private capital for renewable energy.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はGX推進のためグリーンボンド市場拡大とタクソノミー整備を進めており、カタール・トルコの事例は中央集権型vs銀行主導型の比較として参考になる。特に開示基準の調和や民間資金動員の課題は日本にも共通。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a comparative lens for global green finance, highlighting how different institutional contexts (state-led vs. regulatory-driven) shape transition finance. The emphasis on standardized taxonomies and disclosure aligns with ISSB and global convergence efforts, providing insights for emerging economies and developed markets alike.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Comparative analysis of green finance pathways in hydrocarbon-dependent economies, useful for transition finance scholarship.
🏢実務担当者:Insights on green bond issuance strategies and taxonomy development for corporate sustainability teams.
🏛政策担当者:Policy recommendations on private capital mobilization through standardized taxonomies and disclosure systems.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT In 2024, global annual issuance exceeded USD 1.1 trillion mostly through green bonds, credits, and sustainability‐linked instruments, yet significant regional disparities remain. This article examines how Qatar and Türkiye, two hydrocarbon‐dependent but rapidly transitioning economies, are integrating green finance into their sustainability agendas. While Qatar leverages sovereign wealth and state‐backed issuances, illustrated by its oversubscribed $2.5 billion green bond in 2024, Türkiye advances through banking sector initiatives and the development of a national green taxonomy aligned with EU standards. The comparative analysis shows that Qatar's approach is characterized by centralized, resource‐backed financing, whereas Türkiye relies on regulatory reforms and diversified instruments to attract both domestic and foreign investors. Despite these differences, both nations face persistent challenges, including limited private sector participation, dependence on fossil‐fuel revenues, and the need for harmonized disclosure standards. By situating these national trajectories within the global green finance landscape, the study underscores how institutional pressures and transition dynamics shape localized pathways. The paper concludes with a clear policy recommendation: both countries must strengthen private capital mobilization through standardized green taxonomies and transparent disclosure systems to scale renewable energy investments and align with global decarbonization goals.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70373first seen 2026-05-05 19:07:09
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。