gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Adopting Indirect Carbon Pricing Strategies for Indonesia: Insights from Global Practices Using a Bibliometrics and Systematic Literature Review

インドネシアにおける間接的炭素価格戦略の採用:書誌計量学と系統的文献レビューを用いたグローバルな実践からの洞察 (AI 翻訳)

Adityawarman Adityawarman, Nabil Visi Samawi, Sekar Ayu Citrowati, Teodoro Marcos Mota, Marcelino Freitas Naikosou, Utjok W.R. Siagian

International Journal of Energy Economics and Policyプレプリント2025-06-25#炭素価格
DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.19320
原典: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.19320

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、インドネシアにおける間接的炭素価格戦略の適応可能性を評価するため、27カ国の事例を系統的文献レビューで分析。再生可能エネルギー補助金やエネルギー効率化プログラムなど、間接的メカニズムが運輸・農業・家庭部門の排出削減に有効であることを示す。カナダやスウェーデンなどのベストプラクティスを参考に、ハイブリッド型炭素価格モデルを提案し、2030年までに29-41%の排出削減目標達成に貢献する。

English

This study assesses indirect carbon pricing strategies for Indonesia through a systematic literature review of 315 articles from 27 countries. It finds that mechanisms like renewable energy subsidies and energy efficiency programs effectively address dispersed emissions from transport, agriculture, and residential sectors. By adapting best practices from Canada, Sweden, and Germany, Indonesia can develop hybrid carbon pricing models to achieve its 2030 emission reduction targets and net-zero by 2060.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

インドネシアの事例は、日本がASEAN地域でのGX協力を検討する上で参考になる。特に、間接的炭素価格と補完的政策の統合は、日本のカーボンプライシング制度設計(GXリーグ・排出量取引)にも示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global carbon pricing scholarship by synthesizing indirect pricing mechanisms across 27 countries, offering a framework for developing economies. Its hybrid model approach is relevant for countries like Indonesia balancing growth and decarbonization, and complements discussions on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive bibliometric and SLR methodology for analyzing carbon pricing adoption in developing countries.

🏢実務担当者:Offers actionable insights on indirect carbon pricing mechanisms (subsidies, efficiency programs) for corporate sustainability teams operating in Southeast Asia.

🏛政策担当者:Presents a tailored hybrid carbon pricing model for Indonesia, with lessons for other emerging economies designing climate policy.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Indonesia faces significant challenges in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while maintaining economic growth. Carbon pricing, encompassing carbon taxes and Emission Trading Systems (ETS), has emerged as a vital tool in achieving global decarbonization goals. This study aims to assess the adaptation of indirect carbon pricing strategies in Indonesia by synthesizing insights from 27 countries using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of 315 scholarly articles. The research identifies Indonesia's unique economic, social, and regulatory challenges, including dependency on fossil fuels, limited renewable energy infrastructure, and governance gaps. The study highlights the effectiveness of indirect carbon pricing mechanisms, such as renewable energy subsidies, energy efficiency programs, and public awareness initiatives, in addressing dispersed emissions from transportation, agriculture, and residential energy use. Additionally, the integration of carbon pricing with complementary policies, including sector-specific benchmarks and international carbon trading, enhances the potential for successful implementation. By adapting best practices from countries like Canada, Sweden, and Germany, Indonesia can establish hybrid carbon pricing models tailored to its context. These strategies can accelerate renewable energy investments, promote economic diversification, and support the country's goal of reducing GHG emissions by 29-41% by 2030 and achieving net-zero emissions by 2060. This research provides actionable recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders to ensure sustainable energy transitions and global climate commitments.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。