gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Comparative Energy Transition Analysis: Japan and Sri Lanka

日本とスリランカのエネルギー移行比較分析 (AI 翻訳)

Zaid Muhamad

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)ジャーナル2026-05-23#エネルギー転換Origin: Global経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20356316
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20356316

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、日本とスリランカのエネルギー移行を比較分析する。福島原発事故後の日本の構造的変化やスリランカの2022年のエネルギー危機を環境クズネッツ曲線(EKC)の枠組みで検証し、両国の脱炭素経路の相違を明らかにする。技術力、資金、ガバナンスの違いが移行の速度と方向性を決定づけると結論づける。

English

This paper provides a comparative analysis of energy transitions in Japan and Sri Lanka, two island nations with fossil fuel import dependence. Using the EKC framework, it examines Japan's post-Fukushima decoupling and Sri Lanka's 2022 crisis, identifying divergent pathways due to differences in technology, finance, and governance, despite both targeting 2050 carbon neutrality.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本にとって、福島後のエネルギー政策の転換と効率改善の成果を、スリランカのような発展途上国と比較することで、日本のGX戦略の強みと課題が浮き彫りになる。SSBJやグリーントランスフォーメーション政策の国際的文脈での位置づけに示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This comparative study offers global insight into how high-income and lower-middle-income island nations navigate energy transitions under import dependency and climate goals. It contributes to broader discourse on differentiated decarbonization pathways, relevant for TCFD/ISSB frameworks and transition finance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:The EKC-based comparison provides a methodological framework for analyzing decoupling in different economic contexts.

🏢実務担当者:Sectoral energy demand trends and decarbonization strategies can inform corporate energy sourcing and risk management.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of financial and technological capacity in shaping effective energy transition policies, especially for import-dependent economies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

This paper provides a comparative analysis of energy transitions in Japan and Sri Lanka, two island nations with contrasting economic profiles but shared vulnerability to fossil fuel import dependence. Japan, a high-income economy, experienced a structural shock after the 2011 Fukushima disaster that upended its nuclear strategy and triggered a decade of fossil fuel substitution, followed by a strong efficiency-driven recovery. Sri Lanka, a lower-middle-income economy, faced an acute energy crisis in 2022 rooted in import dependency and foreign reserve depletion. Using the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) framework, the paper analyzes Japan's decoupling trajectory from 2001 to 2023 and examines its limitations for developing economies. Sectoral challenges-energy mix composition, final energy demand trends, high-consumption sectors, and decarbonization strategies-are assessed for both countries. The paper concludes that while both nations share a common goal of carbon neutrality by 2050, their pathways diverge fundamentally due to differences in technological capacity, financial resources, and institutional governance.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。