The modular governance of blue carbon resources: an empirical analysis of China
ブルーカーボン資源のモジュラーガバナンス：中国の実証分析 (AI 翻訳)
Xiangjun Zhang, Ran Guo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、中国のブルーカーボン資源の市場ベースの配分とガバナンスを強化するためのモジュラーガバナンスフレームワークを提案する。福建、広東、海南のパイロットプログラムを比較分析し、公共監視機能と民間開発権の分離、市場メカニズムによる価格差別化、保険商品などの金融モジュールの出現を明らかにした。また、国際認証基準との整合性や地域プラットフォームの役割など、制度的課題と解決策を示している。
English
This paper proposes a modular governance framework to enhance market-based allocation and governance of blue carbon resources in China. Through comparative case analysis of pilot programs in Fujian, Guangdong, and Hainan, it reveals decoupling of public monitoring from private development rights, price differentiation via market mechanisms, and emergence of financial modules like insurance. It identifies institutional barriers and offers pathways for improving efficiency and international alignment.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもブルーカーボン（藻場・干潟など）の活用が進む中、中国のモジュラーガバナンス事例は、制度設計や市場連携の参考になる。特に、Jブルークレジット制度との比較や、地域プラットフォームの役割について示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides insights into China's innovative governance of blue carbon, a topic gaining global attention. The modular framework offers lessons for integrating market mechanisms and community rights, relevant for international climate policy and carbon markets (e.g., Article 6 of the Paris Agreement).
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Highlights the application of modularity theory to blue carbon governance, contributing to literature on carbon sinks and institutional design.
🏢実務担当者:Offers governance models that can be adapted for corporate nature-based solutions projects and carbon credit sourcing in China.
🏛政策担当者:Provides actionable insights for designing regulatory frameworks that balance public, private, and community interests in blue carbon markets.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop a modular governance framework that can support China’s climate mitigation and adaptation commitments in international climate agreements by enhancing market-based allocation and governance of blue carbon resources in China. Design/methodology/approach A multi-case comparative analysis of blue carbon regulatory pilot programs in Fujian, Guangdong and Hainan is conducted using a theory of modularity. A systematized diagnoses of institutional barriers to China’s blue carbon governance is presented, as well as pathways for improving institutional efficiency and integrating the market. Findings Public monitoring functions are progressively decoupled from private development rights in the market oriented under regulation model. Market mechanisms have driven significant price differentiation in blue carbon trading, alongside the emergence of financial modularity such as insurance products. In the entrusted management model, communities retain use rights, while enterprises acquire rights of exploitation, allowing compensation funds to support livelihood transitions without forced reclamations. The international connection model prioritizes alignment with the Verified Carbon Standard to facilitate cross-border blue carbon transactions. However, all models operate through local platforms rather than the national China Certified Emission Reduction mechanism, revealing a critical modular mismatch. Originality/value This study proposes a modular governance framework that formalizes public regulatory functions, marketizes private transaction rights and socializes community-based hybrid rights. Providing actionable governance solutions across institutional, technical and international cooperation dimensions, this study contributes to the global discourse on blue carbon resources.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1108/ijccsm-09-2025-0361first seen 2026-06-26 05:09:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。