Asia’s “Other” Giant: The Political Economy of India’s Clean Energy Transition
アジアの「もう一つの」巨人:インドのクリーンエネルギー転換の政治経済学 (AI 翻訳)
Simran Keshwani
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、インドの太陽光・風力・グリーン水素産業における国家の役割を政治経済学的に分析。従来の二分法を超え、国内政治連合と地政学的要因がグリーン産業転換に与える影響を明らかにする。発展途上国の産業政策に新たな視座を提供。
English
This study analyzes the political economy of India's clean energy transition, focusing on solar, wind, and green hydrogen. It develops a framework expanding embedded autonomy to include domestic coalitions and geopolitical factors, explaining how India's state capacity enables or constrains green industrial transformation. Findings suggest moving beyond the developmental state ideal type for late industrializers.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
インドのグリーンエネルギー転換の政治経済分析は、日本企業の新興国市場戦略や政策立案に示唆を与える。特に地政学的要因を重視した枠組みは、日本のエネルギー安全保障政策にも応用可能。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a nuanced political economy framework for understanding clean energy transitions in emerging economies, challenging dominant narratives and providing insights for global climate policy and investment strategies. It is relevant for comparative studies of state capacity and industrial policy in the context of decarbonization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a differentiated analytical framework for studying green industrial policy in emerging economies, combining domestic politics and geopolitics.
🏢実務担当者:Offers context on India's renewable energy market dynamics and policy environment, useful for investment and partnership decisions.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the role of domestic coalitions and geopolitics in shaping clean energy transitions, relevant for designing effective industrial policies.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Over the past two decades, India has launched a series of initiatives to expand renewable energy and cultivate domestic green manufacturing. From its modest beginnings under the 2008 National Action Plan on Climate Change, India is now the world’s third largest producer of renewable energy. For a state that is often cast as weak and predatory, these achievements present an understudied area of analysis.There are two extreme viewpoints that research has posited to explain these significant developments. In one camp, India is frequently portrayed as an enormous success story and a favourable investment destination in emerging industries such as solar, attracting the world’s largest institutional investors. In the other camp, scholars are preoccupied with highlighting the institutionally weak character of the state which has slowed down growth in green industries.This study charts a different, more nuanced, course from these reductive binaries. My core aim is to probe the Indian state’s role in driving three key technological industries widely seen as critical to transitioning to a green economy: solar, wind, and green hydrogen. The central research question I seek to answer is: <i>What institutional and political factors have enabled (or constrained) the Indian state’s capacity to execute a green industrial transformation?</i>To address this question, I develop a differentiated framework that builds on Peter Evans’ concept of <i>embedded autonomy </i>but expands it in two critical ways. First, it integrates the role of domestic political coalitions as essential to shaping policy continuity, industrial alliances, and implementation capacity. These factors are often amiss in the literature on late, late industrialising nations. For emerging economies, informal ties between private capital and the state; and coalitions of domestic actors are critical to understanding policy stasis or implementation. In the case of India, the ‘re-development’ of a national psyche that gives primacy to development and economic growth to project international leadership, and popular political support for big business led growth has meant these networks are working towards green industrialisation in mutually beneficial ways.Second, my approach foregrounds the evolving geopolitical terrain within which latecomer states now operate. In the context of the Indian state, a study of institutions which does not factor in geopolitical contestations and threats is insufficient in explaining the state’s efforts to promote clean energy. The state has nurtured ties with regional neighbours and uses political activism to ensure access to green energy for its ally states. In doing so, the state expands into newer export markets for its homegrown industries; and maintains regional leadership.This study will show that green industrialisation for late, late industrialising nations, in this view, is no longer limited to high levels of embedded autonomy in the institutional make-up of a state. Domestic politics have a strong bearing on facilitating or obstructing the formulation and implementation of policies as does a global system of rules, rivalries, and rents. My findings suggest a need to move beyond an unfruitful pre-occupation with ideal types such as the ‘developmental state’ concept in debates over advancing green growth in today’s industrialising countries.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.25949/32060589.v1first seen 2026-06-15 05:04:09 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:41:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。