Energy: A Chronic Hunger
エネルギー:慢性の飢餓 (AI 翻訳)
Ahmed Mousa Jaafar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は文明現象としての慢性的エネルギー飢餓仮説を検討する。資源不足ではなくエネルギーの分配と方向性に問題の根源があると主張し、燃焼集約型文明から知識集約型文明への移行を提案する。AIのエネルギー消費やジェヴォンズのパラドックスなども分析対象としている。
English
This paper examines the hypothesis of chronic energy hunger as a persistent civilizational phenomenon. It argues that the crisis lies not in resource scarcity but in how energy is distributed and directed, and proposes a transition from a combustion-intensive to a knowledge-intensive civilization. It also analyzes AI energy consumption, Jevons Paradox, and renewable energy boundaries.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX実現に向け、エネルギー供給と需要の両面での変革が求められる中、本論文はエネルギーの分配や知識集約的な活用の重要性を提起している。特にAIのエネルギー消費増大は日本企業のScope2排出にも影響を与える点で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
The paper contributes to the global debate on energy transition by questioning the assumption that efficiency alone solves energy hunger, offering a conceptual framework relevant to net-zero strategies and the Jevons Paradox.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a philosophical framework for understanding energy consumption beyond physical scarcity, useful for energy transition theorists.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests rethinking energy policy to focus on distribution and knowledge intensity rather than just increasing supply.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This study examines the hypothesis of chronic energy hunger as an enduring civilizational phenomenon — one that cannot be explained solely through resource scarcity or rising material demand, but rather through the ways in which civilizations reorganize and allocate energy across time. The study departs from a critique of the conventional assumption that links progress to the raw increase in energy consumption, proposing instead that a significant dimension of the crisis may be rooted in how energy is distributed and directed within economic, social, and institutional systems. The study adopts a synthetic-analytical approach that draws on the philosophy of technology, strategic analysis, and selected concepts from energy economics, complexity science, innovation studies, and modern computing. It examines the relationship between energy, knowledge, and efficiency as one of reorganization rather than direct substitution — wherein knowledge does not represent an alternative to energy, but rather a different mode of investing and directing it toward long-term, cumulative capabilities. The study advances the concept of a transition from a combustion-intensive civilization to a knowledge-intensive civilization — not as an inevitable shift or a break from physical constraints, but as a transformation in the architecture of energy use and the nature of the value it generates. It further tests the limits of this hypothesis through an analysis of the Jevons Paradox, the boundaries of renewable energy, artificial intelligence's energy consumption, inter-country disparities, and the risks associated with resource reallocation. The study concludes that civilizational progress appears to be tied not merely to increasing the quantities of energy produced, but to the capacity of societies to convert energy into knowledge, organizational efficiency, and future capabilities that are self-reproducing. It proposes that energy hunger may never disappear historically — rather, it reconstitutes itself with each new civilizational expansion — and that the true challenge may lie not in eliminating this hunger altogether, but in constructing an institutional and technological architecture more capable of channeling it away from open-ended combustive depletion and toward a more stable and less destructive knowledge cycle.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20370252first seen 2026-06-14 04:27:07 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:41:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。