Spatial Spillover Effects of Formal Environmental Regulation on Urban Green Total Factor Productivity
正式な環境規制が都市のグリーン全要素生産性に及ぼす空間的波及効果 (AI 翻訳)
R. Zhou, Yunsheng Zhang, Ruyu Yang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2012～2024年の中国280都市パネルデータを用いて、命令統制型と市場インセンティブ型の環境規制が近隣都市のグリーン全要素生産性（GTFP）に与える波及効果を分析。市場ベース規制は正の波及効果を生む一方、命令統制型は負の効果を示す。仲介分析により産業移転が抑制効果を持つことも判明。
English
Using a panel of 280 Chinese cities from 2012-2024, this study examines spatial spillover effects of command-and-control vs. market-based environmental regulation on green total factor productivity. Market-based regulation yields positive spillovers, while command-and-control reduces local and neighboring GTFP. Mediation analysis reveals industrial relocation as a suppressing channel.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の環境規制の空間的波及効果を実証した本稿は、日本のGX政策（特に地域間波及や炭素価格導入）の設計において参考になる。日本の自治体間の環境規制の違いが生産性に与える影響を考察する際の示唆となる。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical evidence on spatial spillovers of environmental regulation, relevant for global GX policy design. It highlights the superiority of market-based instruments (e.g., carbon pricing) over command-and-control, offering insights for policymakers implementing carbon markets and regional coordination.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Spatial econometric methods and mediation analysis applied to environmental regulation and green productivity offer methodological insights for GX research.
🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates that market-based regulation (e.g., carbon emissions trading) can positively spill over to neighboring regions, informing the design of regional GX policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study investigates the spatial implications of formal environmental regulation for urban green development by separating command-and-control tools from market incentive-based approaches and analyzing a 280-city panel dataset from China spanning 2012–2024. A spatial Durbin model is employed to assess the spillover effects of these regulatory tools on GTFP. The estimation results show that command-and-control regulation exerts a significant negative spillover effect on neighboring cities and is also associated with a reduction in local GTFP. In contrast, market-based regulation generates positive spillovers that benefit surrounding cities and is linked to improvements in both local and nearby GTFP. Regional heterogeneity analysis shows that command-and-control regulation produces negative but insignificant spillovers in the eastern and western regions and positive yet insignificant effects in the central and northeastern regions, whereas market-based regulation generates significant positive spillovers across all regions. Mediation analysis suggests that industrial relocation has a significant suppression effect in the relationship between CER and GTFP. When the carbon emissions trading scheme is used as a proxy for market-based regulation, the policy initially appears to suppress GTFP, although its effect tends to become positive over time. Informal environmental regulation is found to enhance local GTFP and to generate favorable spillovers for neighboring cities. Taken together, these findings suggest that policymakers should place greater emphasis on market-based and informal regulatory approaches, while encouraging firms and the public to play a more active role in advancing urban green development.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073364first seen 2026-05-15 17:38:14
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。