CARBON TAX PRACTICE IN THE TRANSPORTATION SECTOR : OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN INDONESIA
運輸部門における炭素税の実践：インドネシアの機会と課題 (AI 翻訳)
Indah Puspasari, Verani Carolina
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はインドネシア運輸部門での炭素税導入の機会と課題を文献レビューと二次データ分析で検討。直接炭素税（スウェーデン、日本型）と排出量取引（韓国、シンガポール型）を比較し、直接税の方が安定した税収をもたらすが経済負担が大きいと指摘。2025～2030年の税収を約29.97兆ルピアと試算し、段階的・公平な政策と制度整備の必要性を提言。
English
This study examines carbon taxation in Indonesia's transport sector using literature review and secondary data. It compares direct carbon taxes (Sweden, Japan) to emissions trading (South Korea, Singapore), finding direct taxes offer stable revenue but higher burdens. Simulated revenue for direct tax is IDR 29.97 trillion (2025-2030), with recommendations for phased, equitable policy and institutional strengthening.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は炭素税・排出量取引の検討を進めており、本稿の段階的導入の示唆は参考になる。特に運輸部門の特性・税収予測手法は国内政策設計に応用可能。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a comparative analysis of carbon pricing instruments (tax vs. ETS) in the transport sector, relevant for countries designing national carbon pricing strategies. The revenue projection methodology and phased approach offer insights for emerging economies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful for comparative carbon pricing design research, especially in transport and developing country contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Transport sector sustainability teams can learn from the phased implementation approach and revenue estimation methods.
🏛政策担当者:Indonesian policymakers can directly use the findings; others can consider the trade-offs between tax and ETS for transport decarbonization.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines the implementation of carbon taxation in Indonesia’s transport sector by analyzing its opportunities and challenges through a qualitative method using literature review and secondary data analysis. The research highlights the urgency of emission reduction, as transportation contributes approximately 23% of Indonesia’s total emissions, primarily from land-based vehicles. The methodology involves a comparative policy analysis and revenue projection using Holt's Linear Exponential Smoothing. The findings reveal that direct carbon taxes, as adopted in Sweden and Japan, provide greater revenue certainty but impose higher economic burdens. In contrast, emissions trading schemes (ETS), as implemented in South Korea and Singapore, are more flexible and market-driven but result in lower and less predictable revenues. Simulation results estimate that direct carbon taxation in the transport sector could generate approximately IDR 29.97 trillion between 2025 and 2030, while ETS may yield only around IDR 13.60 trillion. The study concludes that a phased, equitable, and well-targeted carbon tax policy—combined with strengthened institutional capacity, public education, and infrastructure development—can support Indonesia's climate goals while balancing social equity and economic growth.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v10i1.7434first seen 2026-05-14 23:09:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。