gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Enabling change and innovation in marine governance: Lessons learnt from the Danish Bornholm Energy Island

海洋ガバナンスにおける変革とイノベーションの実現：デンマーク・ボーンホルム・エネルギーアイランドからの教訓 (AI 翻訳)

Sun Cole Seeberg Dyremose, Carolijn van Noort, Peter Sorknæs, Daniele Pagani

Figshareジャーナル2026-04-22#エネルギー転換Origin: EU
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8437760
原典: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8437760

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、デンマークのボーンホルム・エネルギーアイランド（BEI）プロジェクトを事例に、海洋ガバナンスにおける変革とイノベーションの促進・阻害条件を分析。多層協調海洋ガバナンスモデルを用いて、利害関係者の動機の断片化、情報共有不足、地政学的複雑性がプロジェクトの不確実性や遅延を引き起こしたことを明らかにした。

English

This paper analyzes the enabling and constraining conditions for change and innovation in marine governance using the Danish Bornholm Energy Island (BEI) as a case study. Using the Multilayered Collaborative Marine Governance (MLCMG) Model, it finds that fragmented stakeholder motivations, lack of dissemination resources, and a complex geopolitical landscape led to project uncertainties, increased costs, and deficient stakeholder engagement.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも洋上風力発電の拡大が進む中、本論文の海洋ガバナンスにおける協調・イノベーションの知見は、日本のエネルギー転換政策にも示唆を与える。特に利害関係者間の調整やガバナンス能力の重要性は、日本の洋上風力プロジェクトにも応用可能である。

In the global GX context

This paper offers valuable insights for global energy transition governance, particularly for large-scale offshore wind projects. The analysis of collaboration dynamics and institutional attributes provides lessons for policymakers and developers worldwide on managing complex multi-stakeholder energy hubs.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Researchers studying energy governance, marine spatial planning, or innovation in renewable energy will find the MLCMG model and case analysis useful.

🏢実務担当者:Project developers and energy companies involved in offshore wind hubs can learn about potential pitfalls in stakeholder engagement and governance.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers in Europe and beyond can use the findings to design better governance frameworks for energy islands and offshore wind projects.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Abstract In 2020, to meet the European Green Deal goals, Denmark announced the Energy Islands: large-scale transforming stations meant to collect, convert and redistribute energy generated by offshore wind farms. One example is Bornholm Energy Island (BEI), an energy hub placed on the Danish island of Bornholm. BEI is part of a future internationally shared energy network across the Baltic Sea and has received status as a Project of Common Interest within the European Union. However, economic and environmental uncertainties, alongside disagreements about roles and responsibilities between international public institutions and industries, resulted in an indefinite pause of the project in early 2025 and a reimplementation eight months later. To understand these outcomes, this paper explores the enabling and constraining conditions connected to change, innovation, and stagnation in governance of the energy sector, looking specifically at the case of BEI. Data collection and analysis are structured using the Multilayered Collaborative Marine Governance (MLCMG) Model, which focuses on four building blocks of change and innovation in marine governance arrangements: collaboration dynamics, institutional attributes, governance capabilities, and the role of E-governance tools. Results indicate that fragmented stakeholder motivations, the lack of dissemination resources, and a complex geopolitical landscape have led to project uncertainties, increased expenses and a deficiency in stakeholder engagement. The discussion section examines the linkages between the building blocks of change and innovation in the case of BEI, providing direction for policy changes for future offshore energy hub projects.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。