gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Assessing the Low-Carbon Transition of Manufacturing Clusters and Its Evolution: Evidence from China

製造業クラスターの低炭素移行評価とその進化:中国からのエビデンス (AI 翻訳)

Xiaofei Liao, Qin Chu, Xiaohui Song

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-29#エネルギー転換Origin: CN
DOI: 10.3390/su18094384
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094384

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、中国の四大工業基地を対象に、エントロピー加重CRITIC-グレイ関係TOPSIS法を用いて低炭素移行(LCT)レベルを測定。2013~2023年のデータから、低炭素技術が主要な推進力であること、地域間格差が拡大していること、資源都市の移行が遅れていることを明らかにした。産業構造の最適化は資源地域で、技術革新は先進地域で効果的。

English

This study measures the low-carbon transition (LCT) levels of China's four major industrial bases from 2013 to 2023 using an entropy-weighted CRITIC-grey relational TOPSIS method. It finds that low-carbon technology is the core driver, intra-base disparities widened, and resource-based cities lag due to rigid industrial structures. Industrial structure optimization helps resource regions, while technological innovation benefits developed regions.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

中国の製造業クラスターの低炭素移行評価手法は、日本の産業集積地(例:東海・関東)の脱炭素政策立案やSSBJ開示における地域別移行計画の参考となる。特に資源都市の課題は、日本の石炭関連地域にも示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper provides a comprehensive framework for measuring low-carbon transition at the manufacturing cluster level, applicable to global developing countries. The finding that technology drives transition while structural factors cause disparities offers insights for designing differentiated regional decarbonization policies, relevant for ISSB-aligned transition planning.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Use the 'measurement-evolution-mechanism-simulation' framework for cluster-level LCT studies in other contexts.

🏢実務担当者:Apply the evaluation indicator system to benchmark your manufacturing cluster's low-carbon progress against peers.

🏛政策担当者:Design differentiated low-carbon policies targeting technology diffusion and structural reform based on cluster maturity.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The low-carbon transition (LCT) of manufacturing clusters is a critical pathway to addressing bottlenecks in global climate governance and promoting sustainable economic development in developing countries. Accurately measuring the level of this transition and clarifying its dynamic trends are of great significance. Drawing on the economic rationale of a low-carbon economy, this study constructs a comprehensive evaluation indicator system and employs the entropy-weighted CRITIC-grey relational TOPSIS method to measure the LCT levels of China’s four major industrial bases from 2013 to 2023. Combined with convergence analysis, the Theil index, mechanism analysis, and policy scenario simulation, it systematically analyzes the characteristics of disparities and the underlying mechanisms. The study’s results show that low-carbon technology is the core driver of the LCT of the four major industrial bases. The LCT levels of the four major industrial bases have generally increased, with some bases exhibiting a catch-up effect internally. The overall disparity among the four major industrial bases has widened, primarily driven by intra-base differences. Specifically, the Beijing–Tianjin–Tangshan industrial base displays polarization characteristics, while the Central-Southern Liaoning industrial base shows a relatively low-level equilibrium. The transition of resource-based cities lags, mainly constrained by rigid industrial structures and insufficient investment in technology. Industrial structure optimization plays a certain role in improving resource-based regions, whereas technological innovation has a more pronounced effect in developed regions. This study constructs a comprehensive analytical framework of “measurement–evolution–mechanism–simulation,” which refines the quantitative evaluation system for the LCT of manufacturing clusters. The findings provide empirical support for formulating differentiated low-carbon policies for manufacturing clusters and optimizing coordinated emission reduction pathways, while also offering a reference paradigm for similar research in other developing countries.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。