Modular Engineered-Wood Housing in Low-Technification, Seismic-Prone Settings: A Systematic Review of Structural Performance, Digital Fabrication, and Low-Carbon Performance

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Provides a systematic review methodology and identifies evidence gaps in modular wood housing research.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a multi-domain assessment framework for evaluating low-carbon housing systems in challenging settings.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests minimum evidence requirements for promoting modular wood housing as a credible net-zero pathway.

This qualitative systematic review evaluates the potential of modular prefabricated OSB/plywood housing systems in low-technification, high-seismicity settings. These systems are promoted as low-carbon options for emerging contexts, and we assess how far the evidence supports that promise and under which conditions they can contribute to net-zero housing pathways. An adapted PRISMA 2020 workflow was applied to Scopus (TITLE-ABS, 2000–2025); 153 studies were synthesized in a table-first, coded matrix into axes for structural, digital fabrication, sustainability/circularity, and extrapolatable systems—supplemented by curated housing cases—with other EWPs used only for contrast. To address fragmentation and heterogeneity across domains, we developed a domain-based QA/QC instrument (STRUCTURAL, LCA, and FABRICATION) to judge whether studies provide minimally comparable evidence. Structural performance is relatively mature for certain patterns (calibrated FEM, cyclic tests, some 1:1 trials), whereas digital fabrication and LCA evidence remain partial: file-to-factory workflows rarely report verifiable QA/QC traceability, and most LCAs stop at A1–A3 with uneven treatment of A4, C/D, and biogenic carbon. Full convergence of adequate STRUCTURAL, LCA, and FABRICATION evidence within the same system type is rare, so both transferability to low-technification, seismic-prone settings and alignment with net-zero objectives must be characterized as conditional rather than established. The review identifies minimum multi-domain thresholds—technical robustness, whole-life LCA coverage, and verifiable QA/QC—as prerequisites for positioning modular OSB/plywood housing as a credible low-carbon pathway. These conclusions are limited by Scopus-only, English-language coverage and methodological heterogeneity, especially in the LCA.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18084096first seen 2026-05-17 05:49:14