Research on the Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Examination Based on 284 Prefecture-level Cities in China
炭素排出権取引政策が炭素排出に与える影響に関する研究:中国284の地級市を対象とした実証分析 (AI 翻訳)
Hao Li, Yuxiao Lei, Nuo Li, Nuo Wang, Kexin Liu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は中国のETSパイロット政策を自然実験として利用し、2003~2017年の284の地級市パネルデータに差分の差分法を適用して、ETSの炭素削減効果とメカニズムを実証的に分析した。結果は、ETSが総排出量と炭素強度の両方を削減し、市場メカニズムと行政介入の両方を通じて効果を発揮することを示した。また、資源賦存、割当方法、炭素価格による異質性も明らかになった。
English
This study uses China's pilot ETS as a quasi-natural experiment. Using panel data of 284 Chinese cities from 2003-2017 and a multi-period DID approach, it finds that the ETS effectively reduces total carbon emissions and carbon intensity through both market mechanisms and administrative interventions. Effects vary by resource endowment, allowance allocation method, and carbon price level.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国のETSパイロット政策の実証分析であり、日本のカーボンプライシング制度(例えば、炭素税や排出量取引制度の検討)への示唆を提供する。特に、市場メカニズムと行政介入の役割の違いは、日本の政策設計に参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global literature on carbon pricing effectiveness by providing quasi-experimental evidence from China's ETS pilots. The findings on heterogeneity (resource endowment, allocation methods, carbon price) are relevant for designing ETS policies worldwide, especially as many countries consider implementing or expanding carbon markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides robust causal evidence on ETS effectiveness and mechanisms, valuable for scholars of environmental economics and climate policy.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of combining market and administrative measures, and the need to tailor ETS design to local conditions such as resource endowments and carbon price levels.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This study leverages the implementation of China's pilot Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) policies as a quasi-natural experiment. Utilizing panel data from 284 prefecture-level and above cities in China spanning 2003 to 2017, we employ a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) approach to empirically investigate the carbon reduction effects, underlying mechanisms, and heterogeneity associated with the ETS pilots. The findings reveal that: (1) The ETS effectively reduces both the total carbon emissions and carbon intensity in the pilot regions through dual channels of aggregate control and efficiency improvement. This conclusion remains robust after a series of rigorous tests. (2) The ETS achieves carbon reduction in pilot cities through the combined action of market mechanisms and administrative interventions. While the role of market mechanisms is relatively limited, administrative interventions contribute significantly. (3) The carbon reduction effects of the ETS exhibit significant heterogeneity. From the perspective of urban resource endowment, non-resource-based cities outperform resource-based cities in carbon reduction effectiveness. Regarding allowance allocation methods, regions employing a hybrid approach combining free allocation with auction and fixed-price sales demonstrate superior carbon reduction outcomes compared to those using solely free allocation or a combination of free allocation and auction. In terms of carbon price, the ETS policy demonstrates greater effectiveness in reducing total carbon emissions in high-carbon-price regions than in low- and medium-carbon-price regions, but its effectiveness in reducing carbon intensity is weaker in high-price regions compared to low- and medium-price regions. This study provides empirical evidence and policy insights for China to tailor the implementation of its ETS to local conditions, thereby advancing the achievement of its "dual carbon" goals (carbon peaking and carbon neutrality) and fostering green transition development.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20261401.11first seen 2026-05-05 22:43:38
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。