gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Mitigating Disruptions in the Distribution Centre for the Australian Household Hydrogen Supply Chain

オーストラリアの家庭用水素サプライチェーンにおける配送センターの混乱の緩和 (AI 翻訳)

Pranto Chakrabarty, S. Paul, Andrea Trianni, S. Saha

Energies📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-02-28#水素
DOI: 10.3390/en19051226
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051226

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、オーストラリアの家庭用水素サプライチェーン(HHSC)における配送センター(DC)の混乱が与える影響を定量化する。多期間ネットワーク最適化モデルを用いて、緩和策なしでは需要充足がゼロに低下し、罰金コストが急増する一方、代替ルートや安全在庫等の緩和策により需要充足率95%以上、収益性大幅改善を示す。政策立案者や管理者に実践的知見を提供。

English

This paper quantifies the impacts of distribution centre disruptions in the Australian household hydrogen supply chain using a multi-period network optimization model. Results show that without mitigation, demand fulfillment can drop to zero and penalty costs skyrocket, but strategies like rerouting, spare capacity, and safety stock improve fulfillment to 95% and profitability. Provides practical insights for policymakers and managers.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも水素社会実現に向け、サプライチェーン強靭化が重要課題。本論文のDC混乱緩和策は、日本の水素供給網設計に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Global hydrogen supply chains face disruption risks. This Australian case study offers transferable models for resilient hydrogen logistics, relevant for countries scaling up hydrogen infrastructure.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Quantitative modeling approach for hydrogen supply chain disruptions is a methodological contribution.

🏢実務担当者:Practical mitigation strategies (rerouting, spare capacity, safety stock) can be applied in hydrogen distribution planning.

🏛政策担当者:Insights on ensuring demand fulfillment under disruption are valuable for hydrogen infrastructure policy.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Australia is committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, a goal that may require a major transformation of the household energy sector. Hydrogen can, however, be deployed as a complementary energy source to electricity by displacing natural gas. But the potential for hydrogen to make this transition is dependent on building a credible Australian household hydrogen supply chain (HHSC), which includes national distribution centres (NDCs), regional distribution centres (RDCs) and local distribution centres (LDCs). The HHSC is particularly vulnerable to operational disruptions under rapid adoption pathways and in perfect-competition market conditions, where infrastructure, supply, and pricing decisions are decentralised. Hydrogen flows may be disrupted at the NDCs and RDCs, leading to failure to meet demand and monetary losses across the HHSC. While many studies have assessed vulnerabilities within hydrogen supply chains, there is little attention paid to the consequences of distribution-level failures. This research aims to quantify the impacts associated with distribution centre (DC) disruptions in the HHSC using a multi-period network optimisation model to assess three operational situations: ideal situations, disrupted-DC situations without mitigation strategies, and disrupted-DC situations with suitable mitigation strategies. The results indicate that without mitigation strategies, demand fulfilment could potentially drop to zero, penalty costs could increase drastically, and profitability could decrease due to not meeting demand. In contrast, the implications of suitable mitigation strategies, including rerouting hydrogen through alternate, unaffected NDCs or RDCs, using spare capacity by increasing operating hours, and maintaining safety stock at RDCs, significantly increase HHSC performance. In these situations, demand fulfilment increases to up to 95%, and profitability improves substantially. This study contributes to the hydrogen supply chain literature by demonstrating how HHSCs can be planned and replanned to manage disruptions in DCs. The study also provides practical insights for policymakers and managers for a sustainable HHSC.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。