gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

To What Extent Has ESG Regulation Influenced Corporate Investment in Sustainable Projects?

ESG規制は企業のサステナブルプロジェクト投資にどの程度影響を与えたか? (AI 翻訳)

Abhiveer Gulati

International journal of social science and economic research📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-01-01#政策Origin: Global経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.46609/ijsser.2026.v11i05.014
原典: https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2026.v11i05.014

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、EUのSFDR・CSRD、米国SECの強制開示案、中国のグリーンボンド制度など主要ESG規制枠組みが企業の持続可能な投資に与えた影響を実証分析する。結果、強制開示により資本フローが計測可能な形でサステナブル投資へシフトし、世界のサステナブル債発行額は2024年に約1.1兆ドルに達した。ただし効果は規制の厳格性やESG成熟度、グリーンウォッシングリスクに依存する。資源ベース・ビューやステークホルダー理論に基づき、ESG規制は単なるコンプライアンスではなく長期的な投資効率と企業価値創造の促進要因と結論づける。

English

This paper empirically examines how major ESG regulatory frameworks (EU SFDR/CSRD, US SEC mandatory disclosure proposal, Chinese green bond system) influence corporate investment in sustainable projects. Results show mandatory disclosure quantifiably shifts capital flows toward sustainable investments, with global sustainable bond issuance reaching ~USD1.1 trillion in 2024. However, effects depend on regulatory stringency, ESG maturity, and greenwashing risks. Drawing on RBV, Stakeholder Theory, and mediation theory, the paper concludes ESG regulation acts as a construction mechanism for investment efficiency and long-term corporate value creation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本論文はEU・米国・中国のESG規制を比較分析しており、日本のSSBJ(サステナビリティ開示基準)や有報での開示義務化の議論に直接的な示唆を与える。特に、規制が実際に資本配分を変えるメカニズムを実証している点は、日本企業の開示対応や投資家対話の優先順位付けに役立つ。

In the global GX context

This paper offers a comparative analysis of major ESG regulatory regimes (EU, US, China) and their impact on sustainable investment, providing valuable evidence for global policymakers advancing mandatory disclosure frameworks like ISSB or CSRD. The finding that regulatory stringency and greenwashing risks moderate effectiveness is particularly relevant for designing disclosure standards that genuinely channel capital toward sustainable projects.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparative framework and empirical evidence linking ESG regulation to investment outcomes, useful for future research on disclosure effectiveness.

🏢実務担当者:Demonstrates how mandatory ESG reporting can influence capital allocation and green bond issuance, helping corporate sustainability teams justify investment in disclosure infrastructure.

🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence-based insights on how regulatory design (stringency, enforcement) shapes sustainable investment, directly applicable to rulemaking for ISSB, CSRD, or SSBJ.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The growth of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) regulatory frameworks in the major economies around the world in the last ten years has had an effective restructuring effect on the corporate investment decision making. The paper will explore the degree in which the ESG regulation can affect corporate investment in sustainable projects based on evidence in the empirical studies, regulation reports and market trends. The analysis will examine three major regulatory regimes-The European Union Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the United States proposal to have mandatory disclosure (Securities and Exchange Commission), and use of green bonds in managing corporate risks in China-and how they have affected the allocation of capital, investment efficiency, and the issuance of green bonds, and corporate risk management. The results indicate that mandatory reporting of ESG disclosures have helped to provide a quantifiable change in the capital flows towards sustainable investments, where the issuance of sustainable bonds with a global scope has reached about USD 1.1 trillion in 2024. Nevertheless, the degree of such an effect depends on the institutional settings and depends on factors like regulatory rigidity, the level of ESG maturity and the occurrence of greenwashing risks. Based on the Resource-Based View, Stakeholder Theory, and the mediation theory of Kharuddin et al. (2025) the paper states that ESG regulation does not only play the role of a compliance issue but as a construction mechanism that will promote the efficiency of investments and the creation of corporate value in the long term.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。