Climate impacts & cost of Biogas-based H2 production coupled with carbon capture and storage (CCS)
バイオガスベースの水素製造と炭素回収・貯留(CCS)の気候影響とコスト (AI 翻訳)
Filip Breitholtz
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ウプサラのバイオガスプラントで水素製造を行う場合の気候影響と経済コストを評価した。水蒸気メタン改質、熱分解、暗発酵の3手法をLCAで比較。水蒸気メタン改質は-2.4 kgCO2/kgH2の排出と低コストで最適と結論。
English
This study examines the climate impact and economic cost of producing hydrogen from biogas with CCS at a plant in Uppsala, Sweden. Three methods (steam methane reforming, pyrolysis, dark fermentation) are compared via LCA. Steam methane reforming yields negative emissions (-2.4 kgCO2/kgH2) and lowest levelized cost, making it the most suitable.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも水素戦略やCCUS推進が進む中、バイオガス由来水素にCCSを組み合わせた本研究成果は、国内のバイオガスプラットでの応用可能性を示唆する。LCAデータは日本のエネルギー転換政策の参考となる。
In the global GX context
As global CCUS and hydrogen deployment accelerate, this paper provides valuable LCA and cost data for a biogas-to-hydrogen pathway with CCS. The negative emissions case (steam methane reforming) is particularly relevant for net-zero targets and carbon removal strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides comparative LCA data for three biogas-to-H2 with CCS methods, useful for CCUS and hydrogen research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers cost and emission benchmarks for biogas plant operators considering hydrogen production with CCS.
🏛政策担当者:Informs policy on supporting negative emission hydrogen production and biogas CCS integration.
📄 Abstract(原文)
To reach the climate goal set under the Paris Agreement in 2015, which aims to limit the global temperature increase to no more than 2 degrees, a reduction in emissions is required. In Uppsala, biogas is currently produced at Uppsala Vatten’s biogas plant at Kungsg˚arden. The purpose of this study is to examine the climate impact and economic cost of instead producing hydrogen at the plant. To achieve this, a production step is added to the biogas plant to convert methane gas into hydrogen. This way, the carbon is taken out and can be stored in bedrock, creating a carbon sink. The study investigated three methods to achieve this: steam methane reforming, pyrolysis, and dark fermentation. These methods were evaluated through a life cycle analysis of their climate impact and economic cost per kilogram of produced hydrogen. The results showed emissions for steam methane reforming at -2.4 kgCO2/kgH2, pyrolysis at -8.9kgCO2/kgH2, and dark fermentation at 6.5kgCO2/kgH2. The leveled cost was between 4-8e/kg for steam methane reforming, 4-12e/kg for pyrolysis, and -3-(- 0.25)e/kg for dark fermentation. Since steam methane reforming resulted in a balance with negative emissions, significant hydrogen production, and the lowest leveled cost, this method was considered the most suitable for implementation in Uppsala’s biogas plant.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/view/divisions/OID-565.html>first seen 2026-05-17 06:37:49 · last seen 2026-05-20 05:13:51
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。