Carbon Storage Response to Land Use Change and SSP-RCP Scenario Simulation: A Case Study of Coastal Area in China

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Provides a robust framework for integrating land-use and carbon storage modeling with scenario analysis, useful for climate impact studies.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights on how land-use decisions affect carbon storage, relevant for corporate natural capital accounting and offset strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of sustainable land-use pathways (SSP1-2.6) for maintaining carbon storage, informing spatial planning policies.

Land use/land cover (LULC) is one of the core driving factors affecting terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage and exacerbating global warming. As an area with the most intense land–sea interactions, China’s coastal zone has experienced drastic LULC transition and carbon storage fluctuations during the rapid urbanization process. Based on the InVEST model, this study analyzes the spatiotemporal dynamics of LULC and carbon storage (CS) in China’s coastal regions from 2000 to 2024, and simulated multi-scenario carbon storage trajectories for 2050 integrating the SSP-RCP scenarios of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Furthermore, the XGBoost-SHAP and generalized additive models (GAMs) were introduced to deeply analyze the nonlinear characteristics and temporal heterogeneity of the driving mechanisms of CS evolution. The results show the following: (1) During the study period, the LULC structure of the coastal region was dominated by cropland and forestland consistently accounting for over 85%, but exhibited a competitive pattern characterized by the continuous expansion of built-up land severely squeezing ecological spaces. (2) The total regional CS showed an overall phased downward trend, accompanied by increasing fragmentation of high carbon sink areas. Notably, as the core carbon pool, the reduction in forest area was the dominant factor causing regional net carbon losses. (3) CS remained relatively stable under SSP1-2.6, representing a sustainable development pathway with low greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5 exhibited more pronounced declines in carbon storage by 2050, indicating that SSP1-2.6 is the most favorable pathway for maintaining long-term carbon storage stability in China’s coastal regions. (4) The driving mechanism of CS has undergone a profound shift from being dominated by natural ecological baselines to human activities. Land use intensity (LUI) has emerged as the strongest predictor in the model, and the nonlinear impacts of human activities have grown increasingly complex over time. This study highlights the complex impacts of high-intensity human disturbances on the coastal carbon cycle, providing a scientific basis for formulating differentiated carbon management strategies and adaptive spatial land-use planning oriented toward the “Dual Carbon” goals.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/land15071137first seen 2026-06-27 05:04:46