Climate Loss, Damage Fund and Other Major Climate Funds: Analyzing the Global Disparity between Climate Finance and Military Expenditure
気候損失・損害基金と他の主要気候基金：気候ファイナンスと軍事支出の世界的格差の分析 (AI 翻訳)
Shiva Balliram, Eduardo Pereira, Mostapha Al-Masry
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
気候変動による損失と損害に対処するための気候損失・損害基金（CLDF）がCOP27/COP28で設立された。本論文は、主要排出国の気候資金拠出と軍事支出の不均衡を分析し、革新的な資金メカニズムと説明責任の必要性を強調する。さらに、CLDFのガバナンス強化と長期的な資金確保のための提言を行う。
English
This paper analyzes the disparity between climate finance contributions and military spending by major polluters, with a focus on the Climate Loss and Damage Fund (CLDF) established at COP27/COP28. It highlights the need for innovative financial mechanisms and stronger governance to ensure equitable climate action.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は気候変動基金への貢献国であるが、軍事支出と気候資金の不均衡に関する本論文の分析は、日本の予算配分や国際的な責任に関する議論に示唆を与える。また、CLDFのガバナンス強化は、日本の気候変動外交にとっても重要な論点である。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global GX scholarship by critically examining the financial commitments of major emitters to the Loss and Damage Fund, linking it to broader climate justice and accountability debates. It highlights the need for innovative finance mechanisms, a key topic for ISSB, transition finance, and international climate policy.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper provides a quantitative analysis of climate finance vs. military spending, useful for researchers studying climate justice, global governance, or fiscal policy.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can use the findings to understand the evolving landscape of climate finance and potential liability for high emitters.
🏛政策担当者:This paper offers insights for policymakers on the funding gap and governance needs of the Loss and Damage Fund, and the importance of aligning fiscal priorities with climate commitments.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change, primarily driven by human activities such as the emission of greenhouse gases (GHG), has led to significant global impacts. These include rising temperatures, sea-level rise, and an increase in extreme weather events such as floods, droughts, and hurricanes. Developing countries, which contribute the least to GHG emissions, bear a disproportionate burden from these effects, enduring far greater casualties and financial strain compared to developed nations. As global temperatures rise, the economic cost of climate change will escalate, with projected losses ranging from $290 billion to $580 billion annually by 2030. In response, the United Nations Climate Change Conferences—most notably COP27 and COP28—have facilitated the establishment of the Climate Loss and Damage Fund (CLDF), designed to support vulnerable nations in coping with the severe consequences of climate change. This paper analyzes historical and current climate polluters, their financial commitments to the CLDF and other major climate funds, and contrasts these contributions with their military spending. By scrutinizing the disparity between climate finance and defense budgets, the paper highlights the critical need for innovative financial mechanisms and greater accountability from major climate polluters. Finally, the paper offers recommendations for strengthening the CLDF’s governance structures and securing long-term funding to ensure equitable and effective climate action.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.29117/irl.2026.0353first seen 2026-05-14 23:04:11
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。