One Health benefits of five European countries adopting 1.5 °C lifestyles
1.5°Cのライフスタイルを採用した5つの欧州諸国におけるワンヘルスの恩恵 (AI 翻訳)
Laura Scherer, Stephanie Cap, Chiawen Chiang, Lea Rupcic, Sif de Visser, Becca Franks
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この研究は、5つの欧州諸国で1.5°Cライフスタイルのワンヘルス共便益を評価。多地域産業連関分析により、GHG削減が人間・動物・生態系健康に与える影響を定量化。ドイツで最大の便益、モビリティと栄養の変更が特に有効。気候対策の動機付けに寄与。
English
This study assesses One Health co-benefits of 1.5°C lifestyles in five European countries using multiregional input-output analysis. It finds substantial co-benefits for human, animal, and ecosystem health, especially in Germany. Mobility changes benefit human and ecosystem health, while dietary changes benefit animal health. These co-benefits enhance motivation for climate mitigation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、気候変動対策のコベネフィットとして健康や生態系への影響を定量化する手法は、企業の開示や投資家対応において価値がある。本論文は欧州を対象とするが、日本でも同様の分析が可能であり、SSBJや統合報告の質向上に貢献しうる。
In the global GX context
This paper extends GX discourse by quantifying One Health co-benefits of lifestyle changes, linking climate mitigation to human, animal, and ecosystem health. It provides a methodological framework applicable globally, including Japan, to support integrated reporting under ISSB and transition finance assessments.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a methodological framework for assessing co-benefits of lifestyle changes using input-output analysis, applicable to other regions.
🏢実務担当者:Offers evidence that lifestyle changes can yield health co-benefits, which can be incorporated into corporate sustainability strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates the importance of integrating health considerations into climate policy, supporting a One Health approach.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The links between human, animal, and ecosystem health call for their integration in a One Health approach. Climate change can have severe impacts on all three dimensions. Such impacts stress the need to limit global warming to 1.5 °C, and lifestyle changes are essential in complementing supply-side changes to meet this climate target. Using multiregional input-output analysis, we assessed the One Health impacts of lifestyle changes in 2030 across five diverse European countries: Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Spain, and Sweden. The greenhouse gas emissions savings resulting from 1.5 °C lifestyles were translated into changes in heat and cold stress affecting human health, as well as changes in potential wild freshwater fish species loss representing ecosystem health. Animal health was approximated by the raw and morally adjusted numbers of farmed animals embodied in household consumption. 1.5 °C lifestyles yield substantial co-benefits for One Health. Germany yields the largest co-benefits for human and ecosystem health and, in relative terms, also for animal health when considering moral adjustment, while Sweden yields the largest co-benefits for animal health in absolute terms. The impact reductions occur worldwide and predominantly outside the countries studied. The options most beneficial to human and ecosystem health are related to mobility, and those most beneficial to animal health are related to nutrition. The demonstrated co-benefits of 1.5 °C lifestyles for One Health increase the relevance and motivation for engaging in climate change mitigation efforts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2026.110252first seen 2026-05-05 19:13:52
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。