From carbon policy to public health: an analysis of pricing decisions in electronics supply chains for costing emissions reduction
炭素政策から公衆衛生へ：電子機器サプライチェーンにおける排出削減コストの価格決定分析 (AI 翻訳)
Tianhui Sun, Na Huang, Wanjun Jiang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、炭素取引と公衆衛生の相乗的ガバナンスの観点から、電子機器のクローズドループサプライチェーンにおけるスタッケルベルグゲームモデルを構築し、「単位健康被害コスト」を導入。健康コストの内部化は低炭素価格時には排出削減を促進するが、過度なコンプライアンス圧力は緑の投資を抑制し、逆U字型の効果をもたらす。また、価格転嫁を通じて高排出企業が市場から排除される一方、利益配分の構造的不均衡が生じることを示し、健康被害補償と回収補助金を含む差別的政策枠組みを提案している。
English
This study models a closed-loop electronics supply chain under carbon trading, incorporating a 'unit health damage cost' to examine the dual effects of internalizing health costs. It finds an inverted U-shaped relationship between carbon price and emission reduction incentives, and that compliance costs are passed to consumers, marginalizing high-emission firms. Profit distribution is skewed against suppliers and retailers. The authors propose a differentiated policy with health damage compensation and recovery subsidies to align economic growth with public health.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の電子機器産業はグローバルサプライチェーンの一端を担い、カーボンプライシング（東京都のキャップ＆トレード等）の影響を受ける。本論文は健康被害コストを組み込むことで、日本企業のサプライチェーン排出削減戦略に新たな視点を提供する。
In the global GX context
This paper bridges carbon pricing with public health, offering a novel lens for global policy discussions on supply chain decarbonization. It highlights unintended consequences of compliance costs and profit imbalances, relevant to the design of effective carbon pricing mechanisms worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a game-theoretic model integrating health costs into supply chain emission reduction, useful for further policy modeling.
🏢実務担当者:Electronics firms can use the findings to anticipate cost pass-through and profit distribution effects under carbon pricing.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence for designing carbon policies that incorporate health damage compensation and support for recyclers.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Carbon emissions and waste throughout the entire lifecycle of electronic products pose a serious threat to public health. This paper focuses on the synergistic governance perspective of carbon trading and public health, constructs a closed-loop supply chain Stackelberg game model, introduces the “unit health damage cost,” and explores the decision-making evolution mechanism under multiple constraints. Research indicates: (1) The internalization of health costs has dual effects. While it effectively strengthens incentives during periods of low carbon prices, excessive compliance pressure can suppress green investment, resulting in a pronounced inverted U-shaped pattern for emission reduction incentives. (2) Price transmission triggers market selection. Compliance costs are passed through to end consumers via prices, marginalizing high-emission enterprises due to price disadvantages and compelling their technological transformation. (3) Structural imbalances in profit distribution occur. Suppliers and retailers bear the primary external cost burden, while recyclers' profits remain decoupled from carbon governance mechanisms. From the perspective of overall social welfare, the public health benefits brought about by the government's emission reduction supervision far outweigh the short-term economic losses of the supply chain, and are conducive to the low-carbon development of the electronic product supply chain and the long-term win-win situation for social welfare. Accordingly, this paper proposes establishing a differentiated policy framework encompassing both compensation for health damages and specialized subsidies for recovery, thereby achieving a win-win outcome for both economic growth and public health.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1723064first seen 2026-05-05 22:01:59
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。