gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Atomic-scale control of stability and mechanical performance in hydrated products during polycondensation process of low-carbon geopolymers

低炭素ジオポリマーの重縮合過程における水和生成物の原子レベルの安定性と機械的性能の制御 (AI 翻訳)

A. Zaoui, W. Sekkal

Results in Engineering📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-26#その他Origin: EU
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110708
原典: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110708

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、リン酸活性化ジオポリマー(PAG)の原子スケールでの安定性と機械的性能のメカニズムを、反応性分子動力学シミュレーションを用いて解明した。アルミニウムが4配位から6配位へ遷移し、Q⁴(3AlVI–O–P)相が最も安定で優れた機械特性を示すことを発見。PAGは従来のアルカリ活性化ジオポリマーより56%高い剛性を持つ。

English

This study uses reactive molecular dynamics to investigate the atomic-scale mechanisms of stability and mechanical performance in phosphoric-acid-activated geopolymers (PAG). It reveals that aluminum transitions from tetrahedral to octahedral coordination, and the Q⁴(3AlVI–O–P) phase is the most stable with superior mechanical properties. PAG shows 56% higher stiffness than conventional alkali-activated geopolymers.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の建設業界はCO2排出削減が急務であり、低炭素ジオポリマーはセメント代替として有力。本知見は、日本国内での次世代低炭素材料設計に原子レベルの基盤を提供する。

In the global GX context

Global decarbonization of the construction sector requires low-carbon binders. This atomic-scale study provides fundamental insights for designing geopolymers with enhanced mechanical performance, supporting the development of sustainable building materials.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Materials scientists can use the atomic-scale mechanisms to guide rational design of low-carbon geopolymer formulations.

🏢実務担当者:Construction material manufacturers may leverage these findings to optimize production processes for higher performance low-carbon binders.

📄 Abstract(原文)

• Reactive molecular dynamics simulation on nanostructure evolution of Phosphoric Acid Geopolymers (PAG). • Aluminum transitions from tetrahedral to stable octahedral coordination. • Q⁴ polymerization increases network cross-linking via P–O–Al/Si bonds. • Q⁴(3AlVI–O–P) identified as the lowest-energy stable phase. • Mechanical performance strongly correlates with AlVI and Q⁴ content. • PAG exhibits 56% higher stiffness than NaOH-activated systems. This study investigates the atomic-scale mechanisms governing the stability and mechanical performance of phosphoric-acid-activated geopolymers (PAG), aiming to resolve existing uncertainties regarding their nanostructure and structure–property relationships. In this work, a novel atomistic investigation of phosphate acid geopolymer nanostructure is carried out using reactive molecular dynamics simulations to link chemical environment, structural stability and macroscopic properties in these low-carbon binders during polycondensation process. Structural validation was performed via simulated X-ray diffraction and vibrational density of states, compared with experimental XRD and FTIR data. Results confirm the formation of an amorphous alumino-phospho-silicate network, where silicon remains tetrahedrally coordinated across all environments, while aluminum undergoes a progressive transition from tetrahedral to predominantly octahedral coordination stabilized by phosphate groups. The evolution of P–O bonding indicates a gradual conversion of terminal P=O bonds into bridging P–O–Al and P–O–Si linkages, enhancing network cross-linking. The Q⁴(3Al VI –O–P) phase is identified as the most stable configuration, exhibiting superior mechanical properties. Finally, PAG shows a 56% higher stiffness for aluminum 6-coordinated and highly Q⁴ polymerized environments compared to conventional alkali-activated geopolymers. These findings demonstrate that controlling aluminum coordination and silicate–phosphate polymerization is key to optimizing performance, providing a fundamental basis for the rational design of next-generation low-carbon geopolymer materials with enhanced mechanical strength and durability.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。