Determinants and Consequences of Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reporting
企業温室効果ガス報告の決定要因と結果 (AI 翻訳)
Thomas Pioch
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は4つの研究を通じて、企業のGHG排出報告の質、データギャップの推定手法、義務的報告規制の影響、排出削減投資の決定要因を分析。気候変動対策における企業の役割と政策の有効性を評価する。
English
This dissertation examines corporate GHG reporting through four studies: data quality issues, estimation methods for missing data, effects of mandatory reporting regulations on emissions, and determinants of managers' emission reduction investments. It highlights the role of firms and policy effectiveness in climate action.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ基準や有報での気候関連開示が進む中、企業のGHG報告の質や規制効果を実証する本論文は、日本の開示制度設計や企業対応に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As global frameworks like ISSB and CSRD advance, this research provides empirical evidence on the determinants and consequences of corporate GHG reporting, informing disclosure policy and practice worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a multi-paper framework for studying corporate GHG reporting, including data quality and regulatory impacts.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of data quality and the potential effects of mandatory reporting on emission reductions.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence on how mandatory reporting regulations can influence corporate emissions and the need for robust data infrastructure.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The need to urgently address climate change has become imperative due to its multifaceted impact on economies, politics, and societies. Economically, the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events linked to climate change poses significant risks to infrastructure, agriculture, and insurance markets, leading to substantial economic losses and hindering sustainable development efforts. Indeed, the global economy is already committed to a 19% reduction in income over the next 26 years, regardless of future carbon emissions (Kotz et al., 2024). This level of income loss already exceeds the cost of mitigation. In the past, economists have also argued that a 3 °C target for global warming is optimal, from a costbenefit analysis point of view. This evaluation may have underestimated the probability and potentially catastrophic outcome of climate tipping points, which are much closer than previously assumed and could already be crossed at an increase of 1-2 °C global warming (Lenton et al., 2019). Moreover, current policies are estimated to limit global warming to between 2.2 and 3.4 °C by the year 2100 (Climate Action Tracker, 2023) and many countries are not on a path which will realistically reach net zero by 2050 (European Environment Agency, 2019). However, the transition to a low-carbon economy also presents substantial economic opportunities in renewable energy, clean technologies, and green infrastructure, with the potential for job creation and innovation. Seventy-two countries have analyzed and highlighted these potentials, with regards to their unique economies, in Long Term Low Emission Development Strategies (LT LEDS) submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 2024). Politically, climate change can exacerbate existing tensions and conflicts over scarce resources, migration, and geopolitical competition, potentially destabilizing regions and increasing social inequalities. In the mid-term, the impacts of climate change are projected to intensify, with rising sea levels, disruption to global supply chains, and increased pressure on food and water security, posing significant challenges to global stability and prosperity. Therefore, urgent action to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, enhance resilience, and promote sustainable development is essential if we are to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. Research into climate change policy and the significant role that private companies are playing, with regards to carbon emissions, is crucial for informing effective mitigation and adaptation strategies that can address the challenges posed by global warming. Investigations into policy 2 instruments, such as emission trading systems and mandates to report emissions, provide valuable insights into their efficacy, feasibility, and potential impacts on various stakeholders. By examining the design, implementation, and outcomes of these policies, researchers can identify best practices, assess their effectiveness in reducing GHG emissions, and evaluate their economic, social, and environmental implications. Furthermore, research helps to identify barriers to policy adoption and implementation, as well as opportunities for enhancing policy coherence, coordination, and effectiveness across different levels of governance. Additionally, research contributes to the development of innovative policy solutions, such as carbon pricing mechanisms, renewable energy incentives, and climate finance instruments, which can promote the transformation towards a low-carbon future. Therefore, this dissertation demonstrates in four separate papers key aspects and challenges of corporate GHG emission reporting and the connected data quality issues, the methodological implications on established econometric analyses of filling data gaps through estimations, the consequences of introducing a mandatory reporting regulation on a firm’s emissions and the multi-faceted determinants that influence managers’ decisions to invest in GHG reduction.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。