Agro-Industrial Residue Amendments as Circular Tools for Soil Stewardship and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
農業産業残渣施用による土壌管理と温室効果ガス削減のための循環型ツールとしての可能性 (AI 翻訳)
Angela Maffia, Federica Marra, Santo Battaglia, Carmelo Mallamaci, Emilio Attinà, Adele Muscolo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、農業産業副産物由来の有機質肥料(堆肥、消化液、ミミズ堆肥等)が、慣行の化学肥料と比較して土壌有機炭素を最大40%増加させ、温室効果ガス排出を削減できることを示した。また、循環型農業の土壌管理が気候変動緩和に有効であると結論づけている。
English
This review synthesizes evidence that organic amendments from agro-industrial residues (compost, digestate, vermicompost) can increase soil organic carbon stocks by up to 40% and reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared to mineral fertilization. It highlights circular soil management as a scalable pathway for climate-smart agriculture.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本レビューは、農業産業副産物の土壌施用が炭素貯留と排出削減に有効であることを示し、日本の「みどりの食料システム戦略」やGX実現に向けた農業分野の脱炭素化に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This review provides evidence for circular agriculture practices that enhance soil carbon sequestration and reduce emissions, aligning with global climate goals and informing frameworks like the UNFCCC and EU Farm to Fork strategy.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systematic comparison of organic amendments for soil carbon and GHG mitigation, valuable for researchers designing field trials or meta-analyses.
🏢実務担当者:Offers guidance on selecting organic amendments (compost, digestate, vermicompost) for improving soil health and reducing carbon footprint in agricultural operations.
🏛政策担当者:Supports policy incentives for circular fertilization and soil carbon sequestration as part of national climate strategies.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Agricultural soils play a dual role in the climate system, acting both as carbon sinks and natural sources of greenhouse gas emissions, which may be intensified under unsustainable management. However, the comparative effectiveness of different soil management strategies, particularly organic amendments derived from agro-industrial residues, remains insufficiently clarified. This review aims to critically synthesize current scientific evidence on soil stewardship practices for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing soil carbon sequestration. The analysis is based on a structured review of peer-reviewed literature published over the last decade, including field experiments, long-term trials, and LCA studies. Comparative insights are provided across conventional mineral fertilization, organic amendments, and circular fertilization approaches based on agro-industrial by-products. The results indicate that organic amendments such as compost, digestate, and vermicompost generally increase soil organic carbon stocks (up to +40% in long-term systems) and can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint compared with mineral fertilization, although responses vary depending on soil, climate, and management conditions. The review evaluates the effects of different management practices on soil organic carbon dynamics, greenhouse gas fluxes, nutrient use efficiency, and soil biological functioning. Special emphasis is placed on the role of waste-derived fertilizers—such as composts, digestates, and vermicompost—in promoting soil carbon stabilization while reducing the environmental burden associated with synthetic inputs. Evidence consistently indicates that soil stewardship strategies grounded in circular economy principles can lower net carbon footprints, improve soil resilience, and mitigate trade-offs between productivity and climate mitigation. By framing soil management within the context of global warming mitigation, this review highlights the multifunctional role of soils as climate regulators and underscores the potential of agro-industrial waste valorization as a scalable pathway toward climate-smart and low-emission agricultural systems.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13050241first seen 2026-05-05 19:33:36
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。