gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Energy Poverty in the Green Transition Era (2019–2025): A Scoping Review Protocol

グリーン移行期におけるエネルギー貧困（2019-2025年）：スコーピングレビュープロトコル (AI 翻訳)

Gölçek, Ali Gökhan

Zenodoプレプリント2026-05-22#エネルギー転換
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20340291
原典: https://zenodo.org/records/20340291
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、グリーン移行期（2019-2025年）におけるエネルギー貧困の実証研究をマッピングするためのスコーピングレビュープロトコルである。測定指標（10%ルール、LIHC、2Mなど）とグリーン移行変数（再生可能エネルギー、炭素価格、移行政策など）の5カテゴリーを特定し、政策対応の枠組みとの共変関係を分析する。ScopusとWeb of Scienceから約2,967件のユニークな文献を対象とし、PRISMA-ScRに準拠した透明性の高いプロトコルである。

English

This paper is a pre-registered scoping review protocol mapping empirical research on energy poverty during the green transition era (2019-2025). It categorizes measurement metrics (10%-rule, LIHC, 2M, etc.) and five types of green transition variables (renewable energy, carbon pricing, transition policies, demand-side technology, and price shocks), analyzing their co-variation with policy response framings. Data sources are Scopus and Web of Science, with an estimated 2,967 unique records, following PRISMA-ScR standards.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、GX推進に伴うエネルギー価格上昇がエネルギー貧困を深刻化させる可能性がある。本プロトコルは、日本におけるエネルギー貧困の実態把握や政策評価のための枠組みを提供し、特にSSBJやESG情報開示において社会的側面を考慮する際の参考となる。

In the global GX context

Globally, this protocol provides a systematic framework to understand how green transition policies and technologies interact with energy poverty, a critical social dimension of decarbonization. It can inform disclosure frameworks (e.g., TCFD, ISSB) that require assessing just transition impacts, and help policymakers design inclusive policies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a rigorous methodology for mapping energy poverty in the context of green transition, identifying gaps in measurement and under-represented populations.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a comprehensive list of energy poverty metrics and green transition variables that can be used to assess social impacts in corporate sustainability reporting.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights how policy framing (e.g., compensatory vs. structural) varies with measurement choices, informing the design of equitable transition policies.

📄 Abstract（原文）

This is the pre-registered protocol for a sole-author scoping review mapping empirical research on energy poverty published during the green transition era (2019–2025). The review follows the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework, refined by Levac et al. (2010), operationalized through JBI methodology (Peters et al., 2020), and reported per PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al., 2018) standards. The review will map: - Energy poverty (EP) measurement metrics (10%-rule, LIHC, 2M, M/2, multidimensional indices, hidden EP) - Five categories of green transition variables: renewable energy, carbon pricing, transition policies, demand-side technology, and transition-linked price shocks - Policy response framings and their co-variation with measurement choices Three research questions guide the scoping review: - RQ1: Mapping the literature (measurement metrics, methodological approaches, geographic contexts, green transition variables) - RQ2: Identifying gaps (under-represented populations, regions, variables, or designs) - RQ3: Charting the conceptual landscape (policy response framing co-varying with measurement choices) Data sources: Scopus + Web of Science Core Collection. Time window: January 2019 – December 2025. Pilot search executed on 22 May 2026 yielded 1,803 (Scopus) + 2,911 (WoS) records, with approximately 2,967 estimated unique records after deduplication. This protocol is registered prior to study selection in compliance with PRISMA-ScR transparency standards. All search outputs, screening decisions, charting forms, and decision logs will be archived on this Zenodo deposit upon completion.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。