Synergistic emission reduction mechanism of command-and-control and market-based incentives: an empirical study based on core firms in supply chains
指揮統制型と市場ベースのインセンティブの相乗的な排出削減メカニズム：サプライチェーンの中核企業に基づく実証研究 (AI 翻訳)
Liping Wang, Ru Li, Chaoyang Wang, Chuangang Li
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国の高炭素産業サプライチェーン企業を対象に、指揮統制型と市場ベースの環境規制が炭素排出削減に与える効果を実証的に検証。差分の差分法と媒介効果モデルを用いた分析の結果、両規制は企業の排出削減を促進し、グリーン技術イノベーションが媒介役を果たすことを確認。市場化度や規制強度の高い地域で効果が顕著であることも示された。
English
This study uses Chinese provincial panel data and 526 supply chain firms in high-carbon industries to examine the effects of command-and-control and market-based environmental regulations on carbon emissions. Using DID and mediation models, it finds that both regulations reduce emissions and intensity, with green technology innovation as a key mediator. Effects are stronger in regions with higher marketization and regulatory intensity.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも排出量取引や温暖化対策税などの市場ベース手法が導入されており、規制の組み合わせ効果を示す本知見は、日本のサプライチェーン全体の脱炭素政策設計に示唆を与える。特に、グリーン技術イノベーションの媒介役は、日本企業の技術開発促進策と親和性が高い。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical evidence on how different regulatory instruments (command-and-control vs market-based) interact to reduce emissions in supply chains. For global GX context, it informs the ongoing debate on policy mix design, especially in emerging economies. The findings on green innovation as a mediator are relevant for ISSB and transition finance frameworks that emphasize technology pathways.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a rigorous empirical test of regulatory synergy and mediation through green innovation in supply chains.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of green technology innovation as a response to regulatory pressure in supply chain management.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence for combining policy instruments to enhance emission reductions, particularly in high-carbon industries.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The effectiveness of carbon emission reductions by core firms in high-carbon industries is a crucial link for achieving China’s “Dual Carbon” goals. Based on provincial panel data from 2011 to 2021 and data from 526 supply chain firms in high-carbon industries, this study employs the Difference-in-Differences method, linear regression, and mediating effect models to systematically examine the mechanisms and effects of command-and-control, market-based incentive, and public participation environmental regulations on the carbon emissions of supply chain firms. The findings indicate that: (1) Both command-and-control and market-based incentive environmental regulations can significantly reduce corporate carbon emissions and carbon intensity; the direct emission reduction effect of public participation regulations is not yet significant. (2) Mechanism tests reveal that green technology innovation plays a key mediating role in the carbon reduction process driven by the two types of formal regulations. (3) Heterogeneity analysis shows that the policy effects are more pronounced in regions with a higher degree of marketization and greater intensity of environmental regulation. This study provides a mechanistic explanation for understanding how firms in high-carbon industries can resolve the dilemma of emission reduction responsibilities through green innovation under regulatory pressure, and offers empirical evidence for differentially combining environmental regulation tools to facilitate low-carbon transformation of supply chains.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-026-00439-zfirst seen 2026-05-19 05:20:35 · last seen 2026-05-20 05:24:11
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。