The synergy of digital innovation and green economy: A systematic review of mechanisms, challenges, and adaptive strategies in the post-Al era
デジタルイノベーションとグリーンエコノミーの相乗効果:ポストAI時代におけるメカニズム、課題、適応戦略の系統的レビュー (AI 翻訳)
R. Santos, María Isabel Casal Reyes
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、デジタル技術(AI、分析、プラットフォーム)がグリーン経済に与える影響と、環境制約・ガバナンスがデジタル普及に与えるフィードバックを整理。労働市場、スキルミスマッチ、グリーンファイナンスとコンピューティングの融合、持続可能インフラ(水素、データセンター)の4領域を検討。デジタルツールは強固な基準・監査・クリーン電力・人材育成と組み合わさればグリーン革新を促進できるが、欠如すると電力需要増大や格差拡大のリスクがある。AIガバナンスや水素サプライチェーンのライフサイクル炭素会計など今後の研究課題を示す。
English
This systematic review examines how digital technologies (AI, analytics, platforms) shape green economic outcomes and how environmental constraints and governance reshape digital diffusion. Four domains are analyzed: labor market restructuring, skills mismatch, convergence of green finance and computing, and sustainable infrastructure (hydrogen, data centers). The conditional-synergy thesis emerges: digital tools accelerate green innovation only when coupled with credible standards, auditability, clean power, and workforce capability; otherwise, they risk increasing energy demand, inequality, and greenwashing. Research gaps and a future agenda including AI governance and hydrogen supply chain carbon accounting are proposed.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は、日本のGX政策(GXリーグ、グリーントランスフォーメーション)や企業のデジタル・グリーン統合戦略に示唆を与える。特に、AIを活用したESG評価の拡大とグリーンウォッシングリスクの議論は、日本の開示制度(SSBJ)や投資家対応の高度化に直結する。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global GX discourse by highlighting the conditional synergy between digitalization and green transition, relevant to ISSB/TCFD frameworks, CSRD, and SEC climate rules. It provides a structured evidence base for policymakers and analysts navigating the intersection of AI governance and sustainable finance, particularly the risks of measurement divergence and greenwashing under heterogeneous disclosure regimes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Identifies three critical research gaps (non-linear coupling, distributional outcomes, AI-enabled finance under heterogeneous disclosure) that define a future agenda.
🏢実務担当者:Offers actionable insights on the complementarities needed for digital-green synergy: standards, auditability, clean power, and workforce skills.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for enforceable AI governance, life-cycle carbon accounting for hydrogen, and SME capability policies to avoid rebound effects.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Digital transformation and the green transition increasingly co-evolve through shared infrastructures (data, energy, and institutions), yet their interaction is not automatically synergistic. This review synthesizes peer-reviewed research and authoritative institutional reports to clarify how digital technologies—especially AI, analytics, and platform infrastructures—shape green economic outcomes, and how environmental constraints and governance feedback reshape digital diffusion. We organize evidence around four domains: (i) labor-market restructuring under AI and digitalization, with attention to wage polarization, rents, and institutional mediators; (ii) skills mismatch and SME adoption constraints as a binding bottleneck for inclusive digital-green upgrading; (iii) the convergence of green finance and computing, where automated ESG assessment expands monitoring capacity but also amplifies measurement divergence and greenwashing risks; and (iv) sustainable infrastructure and energy transition, focusing on hydrogen value chains and the energy footprint of digital systems (data centers and AI workloads). A sectoral case—digital tourism—illustrates both substitution potential (virtual experiences, demand management) and rebound risks. Evidence converges on a conditional-synergy thesis: digital tools can accelerate green innovation and emissions reductions when coupled with credible standards, auditability, clean power, and workforce capability building; absent these complements, digitalization may increase electricity demand, widen inequality, and incentivize strategic disclosure. The review identifies three research gaps that limit policy inference: long-horizon causal evidence on non-linear coupling between digitalization and decarbonization, joint modeling of distributional outcomes and environmental performance, and integrated evaluation of AI-enabled sustainable finance under heterogeneous disclosure regimes. We propose a future agenda that prioritizes enforceable AI governance, life-cycle carbon accounting across hydrogen supply chains, and targeted SME capability policies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.70731/av1h6373first seen 2026-05-05 22:33:45
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。