Green Finance Intelligence and Sustainable Capital Allocation: Artificial Intelligence Driven ESG Signal Processing and Capital Market Efficiency
グリーンファイナンス・インテリジェンスと持続可能な資本配分:AI駆動型ESGシグナル処理と資本市場の効率性 (AI 翻訳)
Dr. Syed Shameel Ahmed Quadri, Dad Ansari, Zonaira Akbar, F. Khan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
AIを活用したESGシグナル処理がグリーンファイナンス・インテリジェンスを向上させ、持続可能な資本配分と資本市場の効率性に与える影響を実証的に分析。312名の金融専門家への調査データを用いた回帰分析により、AI導入がESG情報処理を強化し、情報非対称性を低減することを確認。
English
This study empirically examines how AI-driven ESG signal processing enhances green finance intelligence, leading to better sustainable capital allocation and capital market efficiency. Using survey data from 312 financial professionals and regression analysis, it finds that AI adoption significantly improves ESG information processing, reduces information asymmetry, and supports data-driven sustainable investment strategies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文はSSBJや有価証券報告書におけるESG情報開示の高度化に示唆を与える。AIによるシグナル処理は、日本企業の非財務情報の質向上に貢献し得る。
In the global GX context
The paper contributes to global discourse on AI-enhanced ESG analytics, which is increasingly relevant under ISSB and CSRD disclosure frameworks. It provides evidence that AI can improve capital allocation efficiency, a key goal of sustainable finance initiatives worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a quantitative framework linking AI, ESG processing, and market efficiency, offering a basis for further empirical work.
🏢実務担当者:Demonstrates how AI tools can be leveraged for ESG data analysis to improve investment decisions and reduce greenwashing risk.
🏛政策担当者:Empty string
📄 Abstract(原文)
The rapid expansion of sustainable investment markets has intensified the need for accurate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data analysis to support effective capital allocation. However, traditional analytical approaches often struggle to interpret the growing volume of heterogeneous sustainability information, leading to information asymmetry and suboptimal investment outcomes. This study examined the role of artificial intelligence-driven ESG signal processing in enhancing green finance intelligence and improving sustainable capital allocation and capital market efficiency. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing primary data collected from 312 financial professionals working in banking, asset management, and financial technology sectors. Descriptive statistical analysis revealed strong agreement regarding the importance of AI adoption in sustainable finance, with artificial intelligence adoption recording the highest mean value (M = 4.14, SD = 0.69), followed by green finance intelligence (M = 4.09, SD = 0.68) and ESG signal processing capability (M = 4.07, SD = 0.72). Regression analysis demonstrated that artificial intelligence adoption significantly influenced green finance intelligence (β = 0.41, t = 7.86, p < 0.001), while ESG signal processing capability significantly improved sustainable capital allocation (β = 0.38, t = 6.94, p < 0.001). Additionally, green finance intelligence positively affected capital market efficiency (β = 0.35, t = 6.21, p < 0.001). The findings indicated that artificial intelligence significantly enhances ESG information processing, reduces information asymmetry, and supports data-driven sustainable investment strategies. The study concluded that AI-driven ESG analytics play a crucial role in strengthening sustainable finance ecosystems and improving the efficiency of capital allocation within modern financial markets. References Akash, V., & Kumari, R. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in promoting sustainable and responsible investments. Journal of Social Review and Development, 4(S1), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.64171/JSRD.4.S1.182-186 Aruwaji, M. A., & Swanepoel, M. J. (2025). The impact of AI-integrated ESG reporting on firm valuation in emerging markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(12), 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18120675 Bae, K. H., El Ghoul, S., Gong, Z., & Guedhami, O. (2024). ESG performance and investment efficiency: The impact of information asymmetry. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 91, 101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101919 Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Wurgler, J. (2021). Financing the response to climate change: The pricing and ownership of U.S. green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.02.012 Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033 Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008 Davidescu, A. A., Apostu, S., & Strat, V. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in ESG and sustainable finance: A bibliometric analysis of research trends. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 19(1), 1506–1517. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2025-0117 Elhady, A. M., & Shohieb, S. (2025). AI-driven sustainable finance: Computational tools, ESG metrics, and global implementation. Future Business Journal, 11, 209. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00610-x Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010 Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2021). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1718917 Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889 Giudici, P., & Wu, L. (2025). Sustainable artificial intelligence in finance: Impact of ESG factors. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 1566197. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1566197 Goldstein, I., Jiang, W., & Karolyi, G. A. (2021). To FinTech and beyond. Review of Financial Studies, 34(7), 2967–3008. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab020 Huang, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence, information environment, and capital market efficiency. Research in International Business and Finance, 79, 103094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103094 Hussain, M. A., Vemaraju, S., & Garg, A. (2025). The impact of AI tools on ESG-based sustainable banking practices. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3198 Jellouli, I. (2025). Rethinking portfolio design with sustainable AI and FinTech: Dynamic spillovers in a quantile–frequency framework. Cogent Economics & Finance, 13(1), Article 2568640. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2568640 Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12346 Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137 Kumar, N., Lohano, R. K., Asghar, M. M., Khalid, M., & Awan, D. (2025). Artificial intelligence and green finance: Unveiling the link to financial performance in Pakistan. Asian Bulletin of Green Management and Circular Economy, 5(1), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.62019/abgmce.v5i1.142 Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 62, 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101597 Liu, J., Yuan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2026). The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing ESG disclosure quality in accounting. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19010058 Mansour, M., Al Zobi, M., & Alomair, M. (2026). Artificial intelligence, ESG governance, and green innovation efficiency in emerging economies. Economies, 14(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14010011 Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. (2025a). Bridging the skills divide: A comparative study of skill-based education across SAARC countries with a policy roadmap for Pakistan. Social Science Review Archives, 3(3), 787–795. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i3.913 Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. (2025b). Use of artificial intelligence in school management: A contemporary need of school education system in Punjab (Pakistan). Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(2), 1984–2009. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.2.56 Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. (2025c). Beyond the blackboards: Building a micro-edtech economy through teacher-led innovation in low-income schools. Journal of Business Insight and Innovation, 4(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16875721 Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M., & Nadeem, M. A. (2025). Gauging the gap: Student perceptions of skill proficiency in skill-based education within schools of Punjab, Pakistan. ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(2), 2307–2317. https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.03.0553 Saltık, Ö. (2024). Algorithmic approaches to unraveling ESG impact on financial performance. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 10(2), 459–517. https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.1540178 Schwendner, P., & Posth, J. A. (2024). Trends in AI4ESG: AI for sustainable finance and ESG technology. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1448045. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1448045 Zhang, D., Mohsin, M., Rasheed, A. K., & Chang, Y. (2025). Green finance and artificial intelligence: Catalysts for promoting sustainability. Economic Analysis and Policy, 88, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.08.037 Zhang, L., Wang, H., & Zhao, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 68, 101314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2025.101314 Zhang, X., Li, Y., & Chen, H. (2026). The impact of artificial intelligence on corporate ESG greenwashing. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 103, 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102351
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v5i2.246first seen 2026-05-15 18:57:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。