Just Transition Funding Mechanisms: A Study on International Cases
公正な移行のための資金調達メカニズム：国際事例研究 (AI 翻訳)
SU Ting, Xiaozhen Li, Jingyi Zhang, Xiaobei He, Danqing Shao
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は公正な移行の資金調達メカニズムを定義し、65カ国を対象に国内外の資金動員と公的資金の役割を分析した。先進国では資金メカニズムが整備されている一方、途上国では限定的であり、資金調達の目的・配分・手段に格差がある。途上国はエネルギー部門に集中し、非譲許的融資への依存が債務問題を引き起こす。これらの知見は各国の資金制度設計に示唆を与える。
English
This paper defines just transition funding mechanisms and analyzes domestic funding mobilization and public finance roles across 65 countries. Developed countries have established mechanisms, while developing countries lag, with gaps in objectives, allocation, sources, and instruments. Developing countries focus on energy, rely on non-concessional loans, raising debt concerns. Findings inform policy design for just transition funding systems.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX推進法に基づく移行債や成長志向型カーボンプライシングが進むが、公正な移行の資金メカニズムは未整備である。本稿の国際比較は、日本が地域格差や雇用対策を考慮した資金制度を設計する際の参考となる。
In the global GX context
Just transition funding is increasingly critical in global climate finance, especially under the Paris Agreement and emerging disclosure standards (e.g., ISSB S1). This paper’s cross-country analysis highlights gaps that can inform transition finance frameworks and public-private blending, relevant for policymakers and investors aligning with net-zero goals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systematic framework and empirical comparison of just transition funding mechanisms across 65 countries, filling a gap in the literature.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights on funding sources and instruments (e.g., concessional vs. non-concessional loans) that can guide corporate and financial institutions in structuring just transition projects.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights differences in funding objectives and instruments between developed and developing countries, informing the design of national just transition funding systems and international cooperation.
📄 Abstract（原文）
In the context of global climate governance, the just transition has become a core issue, yet existing research on its funding mechanisms remains wanting. There is a lack of systematic analysis of domestic funding mobilization and the role of public finance. To address this gap, this paper defines the concept of just transition funding mechanisms and focuses on the design of these mechanisms at the national level. This study finds that as of June 2025, among the 65 countries that have committed to a just transition, developed countries have generally established corresponding funding mechanisms, while developing countries have made only limited progress, reflecting a gap in funding actions between the two. Comparative analysis indicates that in terms of funding objectives, developed countries tend to focus on regional balance, whereas developing countries tend to prioritize energy security and economic development. Regarding funding allocation, developing countries tend to concentrate on the energy sector, with inadequate support for social and economic diversification. In terms of funding sources, public sector funds dominate in all countries, but a combination of public and private funding can significantly boost financing scale. Concerning investment instruments, developed countries predominantly use fiscal allocations and concessional loans, while developing countries rely on non-concessional loans, and as such bear high financing costs and face debt sustainability challenges. Drawing on these findings, this paper provides a source of reference for policymakers seeking to establish just transition funding systems in different countries.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345748126500077first seen 2026-05-15 21:30:18
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。