gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Biotechnological innovations in the realm of carbon capture, storage and utilization

炭素回収・貯留・利用におけるバイオテクノロジー革新 (AI 翻訳)

Fanny Machado Jofre, Carina Aline Prado, Vinícius P. Shibukawa, M. T. F. R. Raymundo, Thais Aline Prado Mendonça, Anuj Kumar Chandel

Frontiers in Climate📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-22#CCUSOrigin: Global
DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2026.1805906
原典: https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2026.1805906
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは、CCUSを循環型バイオエコノミーに統合するフレームワークを提示し、気候ガバナンス（COP26～COP30）と炭素ネガティブ技術（SAF、バイオ水素、バイオ炭、バイオプラスチック）を橋渡しする。金属有機構造体（MOF）による回収効率向上や、技術成熟度（TRL）、ライフサイクル評価（LCA）、技術経済分析（TEA）の多次元分析が特徴。ブロックチェーン型カーボンクレジットなどの透明な金融メカニズムが商業化の鍵と結論づける。

English

This review presents an integrated framework connecting climate governance (COP26-COP30) with biotechnological carbon-negative pathways such as SAF, biohydrogen, biochar, and bioplastics. It uniquely combines Technological Readiness Levels (TRL), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) to evaluate scale-up viability. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are highlighted for enhancing capture efficiency. The study finds that transparent financial mechanisms, including blockchain-backed carbon credits, are critical for commercial viability.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本論文はCCUSと循環型バイオエコノミーの統合フレームワークを提示し、気候ガバナンスと技術実装のギャップを埋める。日本においても、バイオ燃料やバイオ炭の導入拡大に際し、技術成熟度やライフサイクル評価を含む多角的分析が政策立案の参考となる。

In the global GX context

This paper bridges climate governance and biotechnological CCUS, offering a multi-dimensional assessment framework that is globally relevant for scaling negative-emission solutions. It underscores the need for standardized sustainability metrics and transparent carbon credit mechanisms, aligning with ongoing discussions in ISSB and transition finance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:GX researchers should note the novel integration of TRL, LCA, and TEA for biotechnological CCUS pathways, providing a replicable assessment methodology.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can use the strategic roadmap to guide investments in carbon-negative assets and understand blockchain-based carbon credit mechanisms.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers will find a scientific basis for standardizing sustainability metrics through initiatives like the Global Biofuels Alliance, supporting scalable negative-emission policies.

📄 Abstract（原文）

The global energy transition increasingly relies on biotechnological innovation to meet climate targets. This study aims to evaluate the integration of carbon capture, storage, and utilization (CCUS) within a circular bioeconomy, bridging the gap between governance and technological implementation. While previous research often treats CCUS and bioenergy in isolation, this review provides a novel, integrated framework that connects climate governance (from COP26 to COP30) with specific carbon-negative pathways and advanced materials. The objectives are to assess the deployment of biofuels (SAF, biohydrogen), biochar, and bioplastics, specifically highlighting the role of Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) in enhancing capture efficiency. Unique to this work is the inclusion of a multi-dimensional analysis incorporating Technological Readiness Levels (TRL), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and—crucially—Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) to evaluate the impact on industrial scale-up. Main findings indicate that while biotechnological pathways are diversifying, the transition to commercial viability depends on aligning these advances with transparent financial mechanisms, such as blockchain-backed carbon credits. The outcomes serve as a strategic roadmap for industrial stakeholders to optimize investment in carbon-negative assets and provide policymakers with a scientific basis for standardizing sustainability metrics through the Global Biofuels Alliance (GBA), ultimately facilitating the scalability of commercially viable negative-emission solutions.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。