gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

CARINA: Carbon-Aware Execution of Recurrent Industrial Analytics

CARINA: 反復産業分析のカーボンアウェア実行 (AI 翻訳)

Muhammad Umar Farooq

arXiv (Cornell University)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-23#省エネOrigin: US経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: automotive
原典: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24561
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

CARINAは、産業分析のワークフローをカーボンアウェアに実行するためのフレームワークである。計測と推定によりエネルギー負荷と炭素排出量を評価し、ピーク時回避により約9%のエネルギー削減を実現する。

English

CARINA is a measurement and estimation framework for energy- and carbon-aware execution of recurrent industrial analytics. It uses lightweight instrumentation and peak-time-aware control, achieving about 9% energy reduction with 7% runtime overhead in two automotive OEM workflows.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本企業のIT運用におけるScope 2削減に活用可能。ただし、SSBJや有報との直接的な連携は薄い。

In the global GX context

The framework offers a practical method for reducing operational carbon in industrial computing, relevant to companies seeking to lower Scope 2 emissions under TCFD/ISSB disclosure. However, it does not directly address reporting frameworks.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Carbon-aware computing technique applicable to recurrent industrial workloads; can be extended with real-time grid data.

🏢実務担当者:Can be adopted by companies with heavy analytics workloads to reduce energy cost and carbon footprint via peak-time scheduling.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Recurring industrial analytics and machine-learning workflows are becoming a major computational burden in modern engineering practice. Large parametric database generation, scheduled model retraining, repeated evaluation pipelines, and extensive hyperparameter exploration can demand hundreds of runtime hours and tens of kilowatt-hours per refresh cycle, yet these workloads are rarely executed with explicit energy-awareness. We present CARINA (Carbon-Aware Recurrent Industrial Analytics), a measurement-and estimation framework for energy-aware and carbon-aware execution of recurrent analytics. The framework combines lightweight run-level and step-level instrumentation, peak time-aware execution control, and local dashboard reporting. The method estimates energy load as the primary objective and translates it to carbon emissions using a local grid emission factor, enabling use even when direct device level carbon metrology is unavailable. We evaluate the framework using two automotive OEM database-generation workflows. The first required 1.48 million scenarios, 180.30 h, and 48.67 kWh; the second required 3.66 million scenarios, 274.75 h, and 74.16 kWh (corresponding to approximately 21.8 kg CO2e and 33.2 kg CO2e, respectively). Preliminary policy analysis suggests that peak-aware off-hours boosting can reduce full-cycle energy load by about 9% with roughly 7% runtime overhead, while naive throttling can increase total energy through overhead effects.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。