Towards Integrated Green Credit and Carbon Market Regime in India: Legal and Policy Reforms for Nationally Determined Contributions Implementation
インドにおける統合的グリーンクレジット・炭素市場制度に向けて:国別決定貢献実施のための法政策改革 (AI 翻訳)
Abhishek Kumar, Prabhat Deep
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、インドの新たな国別決定貢献(NDC)達成に向けて、2023年に導入されたグリーンクレジット制度と炭素クレジット取引制度の断片化を批判的に分析。EU、中国、シンガポールの統合気候市場システムとの比較研究に基づき、インド気候法の制定や統一気候市場規制機関の設立などの改革を提案する。
English
This paper critically examines the regulatory fragmentation between India's Green Credit Programme and Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, launched to implement India's updated NDCs. Through comparative analysis with integrated climate markets in the EU, China, and Singapore, it proposes legal and policy reforms including an Indian Climate Act, a unified regulatory authority, and interoperable MRV standards.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
この研究は、日本が東証カーボンクレジット市場やJ-クレジット制度を運用する中で、異なる制度間の統合やMRVの相互運用性に関する教訓を提供する。特に、SSBJ開示基準との整合性やNDC達成に向けた政策設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global scholarship on climate market integration by analyzing India's nascent but fragmented carbon credit and green credit systems. It offers comparative insights from the EU, China, and Singapore, and proposes a roadmap for unified market infrastructure that could inform similar efforts in other developing countries.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Scholars studying carbon market design, climate policy integration, and MRV systems will find the comparative analysis and reform proposals valuable.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams looking to participate in Indian carbon markets should note the regulatory uncertainty and need for interoperable credits.
🏛政策担当者:Indian policymakers and regulators can use the proposed legal framework as a blueprint for integrating green and carbon credits to meet NDCs.
📄 Abstract(原文)
India’s new Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement (2015) set out ambitious targets for the country by 2030. For operationalisation of these commitments, two landmark market-based instruments have been launched in India, the Green Credit Programme (GCP) under the Green Credit Rules, 2023, under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS), notified by India’s Ministry of Power under the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022, establishes the domestic Indian Carbon Market (ICM). While these are important legislative progresses, these mechanisms are autonomous, with different laws, different ministries and different institutional set-ups. Coordinated interaction is ongoing through mechanisms like the National Steering Committee for the Indian Carbon Market, but these mechanisms are not fully integrated into statutory frameworks or providing a unified registry for seamless interaction between them or with the overall NDC implementation commitments. This paper critically discusses this regulatory fragmentation, provides a comparative study of integrated climate market systems in the European Union, China and Singapore, and suggests a modified legal and policy approach for an integrated climate market system in India. It claims that the lack of a comprehensive legal framework and stringent Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) parameters is a fundamental loophole that will severely affect India’s ability to achieve its Paris Agreement targets by 2030. The paper suggests interlinked reforms, which form the bedrock of a credible, coherent, and NDC-aligned climate market regime for India: enactment of an Indian Climate Act, establishment of a Unified Climate Market Regulatory Authority, statutory interoperability and unified MRV standards between green credits and carbon credits, a domestic Article 6 implementation framework, and a phased integration roadmap.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.82472first seen 2026-06-29 05:29:23 · last seen 2026-06-29 05:29:26
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。