gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Beyond Aspirational Commitments: Evaluating the Implementation of the Sectoral Mitigation Actions of the Lagos State Climate Action Plan (2020–2025) Using the Hale et al 2021 Framework

野心的なコミットメントを超えて:Hale et al. 2021フレームワークを用いたラゴス州気候行動計画(2020-2025)のセクター別緩和策の実施評価 (AI 翻訳)

Rasheed Ololade Alli, Moses Onaolapo, Khadijat Raimi

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-17#政策Origin: Global対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20729495
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20729495

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

ラゴス州の気候行動計画(2020-2025)の実施状況を、Hale et al. (2021)の枠組みを用いて評価。Feedly ProとGemini ProによるAI支援による定性分析を交通、廃棄物、エネルギー分野で実施。交通部門では軽量鉄道の運行開始など前例のない進展があったが、ラストマイルの非効率性が排出削減を制約。エネルギー部門では系統からの独立による電力市場創設という構造的転換を達成。

English

This study evaluates the implementation of Lagos State's Climate Action Plan (2020–2025) using the Hale et al. (2021) framework, employing AI tools (Feedly Pro, Gemini Pro) for qualitative assessment across transport, waste, and energy sectors. Findings show unprecedented transport progress (light rail operationalization) but last-mile inefficiencies; structural shifts in energy (independent electricity market); and persistent ambition bias where targets outpace actual emission reductions.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to the global literature on subnational climate action evaluation by applying a systematic framework to a major African city. It highlights the gap between infrastructure outputs and actual emissions reductions, relevant for cities worldwide seeking to align with TCFD and ISSB disclosure expectations on climate transition plans.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Demonstrates the use of an evaluation framework and AI tools for tracking urban climate plan implementation, offering a model for empirical assessment of sectoral mitigation actions.

🏢実務担当者:Provides insights into sector-specific challenges (transport last-mile, waste policy volatility, energy market restructuring) that city sustainability teams can use to refine their climate action plans.

🏛政策担当者:Illustrates the risk of 'ambition bias' where physical outputs exceed environmental outcomes, urging regulators to design monitoring frameworks that track actual emission reductions.

📄 Abstract(原文)

IMPORTANT NOTE: This version of this article has not been peer-reviewed, it is still in pre-print. For this reason, our result and conclusion should be less regarded. Climate change poses a critical global challenge, and as international agreements procrastinates, sub-national actors like cities have emerged to address governance gaps. Lagos State represents a focal point for these climate challenges in West Africa. This study evaluates the progress of the Lagos State Climate Action Plan specifically within the periods (2020–2025) and explores the applicability of the Hale et al. (2021) evaluation framework. Utilizing a digital intelligence and AI via Feedly Pro and Gemini Pro 3 respectively, a qualitative assessment was conducted across the transport, waste, and energy sectors. The findings indicate unprecedented implementation in the transport sector, marked by the operationalization of light rail lines, though last-mile inefficiencies constrain actual emissions reductions. The waste sector struggles with historical policy volatility and limited recycling rates despite recent structural outputs. Conversely, the energy sector achieved a structural paradigm shift by legally decoupling from the national grid to establish an independent electricity market. The study concludes that while Lagos successfully shifted from aspirational commitments to major physical outputs, an "ambition bias" persists where targets outpace substantive environmental impacts, necessitating future empirical research.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。