How to address barriers to the adoption of agricultural carbon sequestration
農業炭素隔離の導入障壁への対処方法 (AI 翻訳)
Michael A. Meneses, Miguel I. Gómez, David R. Just, Ravi Kanbur, David R. Lee, C.‐Y. Cynthia Lin Lawell
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、農業炭素隔離の普及障壁を分析し、土壌科学と経済的インセンティブの関係を考察。化学投入資材と土壌健康、収量の相互作用について農家が十分に情報を得る人的資本向上政策が、有機農業の採用拡大、炭素隔離量増加、農家厚生向上に最も効果的であることを示す。有機補助金は効果が限定的。
English
This paper analyzes barriers to adoption of agricultural carbon sequestration, focusing on soil science and economic incentives. It finds that a human capital improvement policy (informing farmers about interactions between chemical inputs, soil health, and yields) is more effective than organic subsidies in increasing organic adoption, carbon sequestration, and farmer welfare.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、農林水産省が「みどりの食料システム戦略」で有機農業拡大と炭素貯留を推進。本稿の人的資本向上政策は、日本の農業普及事業やスマート農業技術と組み合わせて検討する価値がある。
In the global GX context
Globally, agricultural carbon sequestration is gaining attention under the IPCC mitigation pathways and voluntary carbon markets. This paper provides a comparative policy analysis that is relevant for designing effective incentives for regenerative agriculture, complementing existing subsidy schemes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a clear comparison of information-based vs. subsidy-based policies for agricultural carbon sequestration, useful for environmental economists and soil scientists.
🏢実務担当者:Agricultural extension services and corporate sustainability teams can use the finding that farmer education on soil health interactions may be more effective than direct subsidies for carbon sequestration.
🏛政策担当者:Indicates that investing in farmer human capital (training on soil science) could be more cost-effective than organic subsidies for achieving carbon goals.
📄 Abstract（原文）
On-farm carbon sequestration offers a significant opportunity to mitigate global greenhouse gas emissions and meet IPCC and UN climate goals. Challenges in coordinating action among millions of decentralized agricultural producers may make widespread implementation difficult, however. This chapter explores the potential for addressing barriers to coordinated action by leveraging recent insights from plant and soil sciences to show how economic incentives to farmers can be realigned with pro-carbon management practices, like regenerative agriculture and organic farming, that enhance the ability of soils to store atmospheric carbon. Results show that a human capital improvement, wherein farmers are fully informed about the interactions between chemical inputs, soil health, and crop yields, leads to increases in the adoption of organic management, volume of agricultural carbon sequestration, and farmer welfare. In contrast, an organic subsidy leads to smaller increases in organic adoption and farmer welfare, and moreover does not substantially increase carbon sequestration.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035344970.00028first seen 2026-06-18 05:45:29
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。