Climate Change as Ecocide: A Zemiological and Social Policy Analysis of the Climate Vulnerable Forum’s Climate Diplomacy
気候変動をエコサイドとして捉える：気候脆弱フォーラムの気候外交に関するゼミオロジーと社会政策分析 (AI 翻訳)
Maria Pournara, Filippos Proedrou
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
気候脆弱フォーラム（CVF）が気候変動をエコサイドとしてどのように捉えているかを分析。CVFの文書をテーマ分析し、気候正義を中心に据えた外交戦略を明らかにした。エコサイドを法律と害の2側面に区別し、CVFは主に「害としてのエコサイド」を重視していることを示した。損失と損害への資金提供や技術移転などが重要手段とされている。
English
This paper analyzes how the Climate Vulnerable Forum (CVF) approaches climate change as ecocide. Using zemiological and social policy methods, it distinguishes ecocide-as-law and ecocide-as-harm, finding that CVF frames climate change primarily as ecocide-as-harm centered on climate justice. The study highlights CVF's emphasis on loss and damage funding, technology transfer, and just transition.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は気候脆弱国の視点から気候正義とエコサイド概念を分析しており、日本のGX政策（特に国際協調や途上国支援）に示唆を与える。ただし、国内のSSBJや有報開示とは直接関連しない。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global climate diplomacy scholarship by empirically analyzing the CVF's framing of climate change as ecocide. It provides insights for policymakers on how vulnerable states conceptualize climate justice and the role of loss and damage mechanisms.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper offers a novel criminological and social policy lens on climate diplomacy, adding empirical weight to the ecocide debate.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note how the CVF prioritizes climate justice and loss and damage, which may influence international climate negotiations.
📄 Abstract（原文）
We explore how the Climate Vulnerable Forum (CVF) approaches climate change as ecocide. Premised upon a joined-up zemiological and social policy (‘What's the Problem Represented to Be?’) approach, our work undertakes a thematic analysis of CVF documents to unpack representations of climate change as ecocide and their links to the CVF’s climate diplomacy. We differentiate between climate change as ecocide-as-law and climate change as ecocide-as-harm to capture both dimensions of the evolving scholarly debate on representations of climate change as ecocide and dissect the CVFs’ climate priorities. Our findings show that the CVF approaches climate change mainly as ecocide-as-harm. The quest for climate justice lies at the center of CVF representations of climate change as ecocide, informing the CVF’s climate diplomatic compass with funding to rectify loss and damage, technology and capacity transfer, ambition raising and a just transition emerging as fundamental means to redress this climate injustice. While climate change is associated with vulnerable states’ breach of sovereignty and human rights, the CVF falls short of conceptualizing climate change as ecocide-as-law and advocating for a law of ecocide. Our work is the first to apply a criminological and social policy lens and conduct empirical research in the CVF climate diplomacy, thus adding to the breadth and depth of criminological and policy-focused climate change scholarship in the Global South and contributing fresh insights regarding the CVF’s climate standing.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2026.2688158first seen 2026-07-06 04:36:51
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。